K-Gun10 Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 just to let u guys know Safety Adam Archalata was traded to bears for what is believed a 6th rounder. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2806226
LynchMob23 Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 Smart move. You get the player you want without having to pay him bonus money. Plus, Lovie was the best person to use him (as a safety, a corner and a linebacker depending on the formation of the offense) so he's doubly happy. And hopefully the Redskins learn to not buy everything in sight...
Phlegm Alley Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 I think that this possibly opens up the possibility of the Skins taking Landry to play FS next to Sean Taylor with the 6th pick.
K-Gun10 Posted March 20, 2007 Author Posted March 20, 2007 I think that this possibly opens up the possibility of the Skins taking Landry to play FS next to Sean Taylor with the 6th pick. Good point
ncbillsfan Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 Smart move. You get the player you want without having to pay him bonus money. Plus, Lovie was the best person to use him (as a safety, a corner and a linebacker depending on the formation of the offense) so he's doubly happy. And hopefully the Redskins learn to not buy everything in sight... I agree. You have to think his struggles in Washington partly had to do with Gregg's scheme. It's hard to see someone go from being the highest paid safety in league history to a complete bust....Although when it is Dan Snyder paying you anything is possible
Phlegm Alley Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 Good point Or possibly trading down a few spots in order to obtain more draft picks in hopes that Landry is still there. Maybe this is a spot where the Bills could move up to if the right player is still sitting there with the #6.
/dev/null Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 On Tuesday, the Bears completed a trade with the Redskins for the 29-year-old. Chicago gave up a 2007 draft choice, believed to be in the sixth round believed to be? they sound as sure as John from Hemet does about what he saw in the sky the other night
LynchMob23 Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 I think Greggo used him like we used Vincent - as the deep middle "in case of" guy. Arch isn't that kind of safety - he doesn't have the cover skills deep to do that, but he has the short and intermediate locked down. As a result, he got kicked out of the plans for their d, since Taylor is the only one allowed to freelance on the defense, at least from what I've seen of it.
ncbillsfan Posted March 21, 2007 Posted March 21, 2007 Good analysis on that. A bunch of my buddies up here are big Skins fans so I got to see/hear all about how bad he was in deep coverage. Taylor blitzed a lot and they left Arch exposed a lot. I think he'll be right at home in the Tampa 2 again with Lovie.
BuffaloBilliever Posted March 21, 2007 Posted March 21, 2007 Smart move. You get the player you want without having to pay him bonus money. Plus, Lovie was the best person to use him (as a safety, a corner and a linebacker depending on the formation of the offense) so he's doubly happy. And hopefully the Redskins learn to not buy everything in sight... They got Coy Wire!?
Recommended Posts