GG Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 How can we let foreigners run our ports? Outrageous The sell-off of America continues.
erynthered Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 Wir haben Weisen, Sie tun zu lassen, wie wir!! sagen! Sterben Sie alle Sie amerikanischer Abschaum!!!
/dev/null Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 what i don't understand is why when there were questions about letting some Arabs run the ports the PC crowd was upset that all Arabs are characterized as terrorists. Yet when a European (caucasian) group tries, somebody makes a negative cultural reference and everyone is supposed to laugh...Nazis/Germans, French/Frogs, English/Wussies, Scots/Men in Kilts, Irish/Drunks, Russians/Communists, Polish/Pollocks, etc
DC Tom Posted March 20, 2007 Posted March 20, 2007 How can we let foreigners run our ports? Outrageous The sell-off of America continues. Nazis are fine. Not only are they not sand !@#$s, but Granddaddy Bush was one.
Orton's Arm Posted March 25, 2007 Posted March 25, 2007 what i don't understand is why when there were questions about letting some Arabs run the ports the PC crowd was upset that all Arabs are characterized as terrorists. Yet when a European (caucasian) group tries, somebody makes a negative cultural reference and everyone is supposed to laugh Welcome to liberalism, GG style.
GG Posted March 25, 2007 Author Posted March 25, 2007 Welcome to liberalism, GG style. Sorry to have invoked your soulmates to make a point.
Orton's Arm Posted March 25, 2007 Posted March 25, 2007 Sorry to have invoked your soulmates to make a point. And what point, precisely, do you think you were you trying to make? That all Germans are Nazis? Please, spare us from that particular piece of anti-ethnic propaganda. Or were you trying--in your own muddleheaded way--to imply that concern about Muslim ownership of U.S. ports is misguided? Because in your mind, there are two types of concerns: those that appear on the Official Pinko List of Approved Concerns, and those which should be dismissed without thought. Concerns about port ownership may or may not be misguided. If you want to show that they are, you'd have to support one of the following statements: - The Muslim organizations in question have a strong ability to resist radical Islamic influence or penetration. - Radical Islamic penetration of said organizations couldn't compromise the safety of our ports due to security measures implemented elsewhere. - Port security is a non-issue anyway, thanks to unthinking liberals such as yourself. Any would-be terrorist can easily enter this country via the border people like you have worked so very hard to keep open. Precisely how many people on these boards do you imagine are as stupid as yourself? Ramius to be sure, but he's not as easily led as you might imagine. But how would you expect a person of normal intelligence to respond to your datum about Deutsche Bank's new involvement with American ports? "Oh my gosh," posters would pant, "if Deutsche Bank is gaining control of a New Jersey terminal, no harm could possibly have come from Muslim ownership of American ports." Even you must have felt a little sheepish about asking people to swallow something so singularly stupid.
GG Posted March 25, 2007 Author Posted March 25, 2007 And what point, precisely, do you think you were you trying to make? That all Germans are Nazis? Please, spare us from that particular piece of anti-ethnic propaganda. Or were you trying--in your own muddleheaded way--to imply that concern about Muslim ownership of U.S. ports is misguided? Because in your mind, there are two types of concerns: those that appear on the Official Pinko List of Approved Concerns, and those which should be dismissed without thought. [blah] [blah] [blah] [blah] The answer to all of your points is 3.5.
Bungee Jumper Posted March 25, 2007 Posted March 25, 2007 And what point, precisely, do you think you were you trying to make? That all Germans are Nazis? Please, spare us from that particular piece of anti-ethnic propaganda. Or were you trying--in your own muddleheaded way--to imply that concern about Muslim ownership of U.S. ports is misguided? Because in your mind, there are two types of concerns: those that appear on the Official Pinko List of Approved Concerns, and those which should be dismissed without thought. Concerns about port ownership may or may not be misguided. If you want to show that they are, you'd have to support one of the following statements: - The Muslim organizations in question have a strong ability to resist radical Islamic influence or penetration. - Radical Islamic penetration of said organizations couldn't compromise the safety of our ports due to security measures implemented elsewhere. - Port security is a non-issue anyway, thanks to unthinking liberals such as yourself. Any would-be terrorist can easily enter this country via the border people like you have worked so very hard to keep open. Precisely how many people on these boards do you imagine are as stupid as yourself? Ramius to be sure, but he's not as easily led as you might imagine. But how would you expect a person of normal intelligence to respond to your datum about Deutsche Bank's new involvement with American ports? "Oh my gosh," posters would pant, "if Deutsche Bank is gaining control of a New Jersey terminal, no harm could possibly have come from Muslim ownership of American ports." Even you must have felt a little sheepish about asking people to swallow something so singularly stupid. Wow. When my browser displays this post, my monitor actually drools...
Taro T Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 And what point, precisely, do you think you were you trying to make? That all Germans are Nazis? Please, spare us from that particular piece of anti-ethnic propaganda. Or were you trying--in your own muddleheaded way--to imply that concern about Muslim ownership of U.S. ports is misguided? Because in your mind, there are two types of concerns: those that appear on the Official Pinko List of Approved Concerns, and those which should be dismissed without thought. Concerns about port ownership may or may not be misguided. If you want to show that they are, you'd have to support one of the following statements: - The Muslim organizations in question have a strong ability to resist radical Islamic influence or penetration. - Radical Islamic penetration of said organizations couldn't compromise the safety of our ports due to security measures implemented elsewhere. - Port security is a non-issue anyway, thanks to unthinking liberals such as yourself. Any would-be terrorist can easily enter this country via the border people like you have worked so very hard to keep open. Precisely how many people on these boards do you imagine are as stupid as yourself? Ramius to be sure, but he's not as easily led as you might imagine. But how would you expect a person of normal intelligence to respond to your datum about Deutsche Bank's new involvement with American ports? "Oh my gosh," posters would pant, "if Deutsche Bank is gaining control of a New Jersey terminal, no harm could possibly have come from Muslim ownership of American ports." Even you must have felt a little sheepish about asking people to swallow something so singularly stupid. Me thinks he was going for choice B. As for the rest of your post, all I can say is "wow".
Sketch Soland Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 How can we let foreigners run our ports? Outrageous The sell-off of America continues. You can't deny it's a fact that Nazis run the best ports around.
Orton's Arm Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Me thinks he was going for choice B. As for the rest of your post, all I can say is "wow". Thanks.
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 Not fine with me! Hey... They give Vet pref to people working in the gov... Why not give "American Pref"... To these types of contracts? America = One team
BoondckCL Posted March 27, 2007 Posted March 27, 2007 How can we let foreigners run our ports? Outrageous The sell-off of America continues. I can't believe we are hiring those who bombed Pearl Harbor.
Orton's Arm Posted April 2, 2007 Posted April 2, 2007 I can't believe we are hiring those who bombed Pearl Harbor. Um, I hope you're just joking around. The Japanese--not the Nazis--attacked Pearl. Germany declared war a few days later. Their goal was to sink the weapons-laden ships we were sending to the Soviets and the British.
DC Tom Posted April 2, 2007 Posted April 2, 2007 Um, I hope you're just joking around. The Japanese--not the Nazis--attacked Pearl. Holy Christ, you're an idiot. How did your brain ever manage to even learn English?
Orton's Arm Posted April 2, 2007 Posted April 2, 2007 Holy Christ, you're an idiot. How did your brain ever manage to even learn English? Did you and your wife Ramius have a fight? Are you trying to get back on his good side by a little "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery"? Because your accusation was so stupid, Ramius himself could have authored it.
DC Tom Posted April 2, 2007 Posted April 2, 2007 Did you and your wife Ramius have a fight? Are you trying to get back on his good side by a little "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery"? Because your accusation was so stupid, Ramius himself could have authored it. It was an Animal House reference, you nitwit! My God, how can you not know that?
Ramius Posted April 2, 2007 Posted April 2, 2007 Um, I hope you're just joking around. The Japanese--not the Nazis--attacked Pearl. Germany declared war a few days later. Their goal was to sink the weapons-laden ships we were sending to the Soviets and the British. Nothing like coming back with a big bang of stupidity to lead off! The line is from Animal House.
Orton's Arm Posted April 2, 2007 Posted April 2, 2007 It was an Animal House reference, you nitwit! My God, how can you not know that? Maybe I felt no need to see the movie "Animal House" having already lived in the animal house known as the PPP boards.
Recommended Posts