pdh1 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 According to liberal pansies who claim islamic terrorism is just bi-product of our evil country's lust for oil (or at least the liberal pansies who admit islamic terrorism is real, not those who think it is make up by the CIA). So why is Spain ( with other war mongers like Canada and Demark) be targeted? They folded like a tent of the Madrid train bombing years ago and left Iraq: MADRID, Spain (CNN) -- The trial of 11 Pakistani men accused of terrorist activities and conspiracy to carry out attacks in Barcelona was delayed for 24 hours Monday after two defense lawyers said they had not had proper access to their clients. The court had been in session only 15 minutes when Judge Manuela Fernandez ordered the postponement. The trial is being held in a secure basement courtroom at the National Court in central Madrid, with one layer of bulletproof glass separating the public from the court, and the defendants sitting in a bulletproof glass enclosure, except when testifying. The men were arrested in Barcelona in 2004, accused of having links to al Qaeda and plans to attack twin skyscrapers on Barcelona's Mediterranean coast and a shopping center in the city's old port area, according to a copy of the prosecutor's charges, viewed by CNN. Three of the defendants -- Mohammad Afzaal, 42, and Shazad Ali Gutjar, 36, and Aslam Choudry Mohammad, 47 -- are considered prime suspects in the case. Prosecutors want each of the three sentenced to 32 years in prison for their alleged leadership roles in a terrorist group, conspiracy to carry out attacks, drug trafficking and money laundering. The other eight are facing lesser charges and sentences. The trial of all 11 defendants could last about three weeks and a verdict could come later this spring, a court source told CNN. The prosecution alleges that two of the prime suspects transferred thousands of dollars to al Qaeda operatives involved in other attacks. According to the prosecution, Gutjar wired nearly $5,000 in separate transactions in 2004 to Amjad Farooqi and Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan, two men alleged to have ties to the 2002 kidnapping and killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan. A source told CNN that Farooqi is believed to have been involved in the kidnapping that led to the killing of Pearl. Separately, a court source told CNN that Farooqi was killed in a police shootout in Nawasbsha, Pakistan, in September 2004, a month after Gutjar allegedly wired him about $1,200. Khan was arrested by Pakistani police in July 2004, two months after Gutjar allegedly wired him about $3,600, the court source said. The prosecution also said Gutjar transferred more than $13,200 in May 2004 to Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, who has been linked the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Ghailani was arrested two months after the wire transfer in Gujrat, Pakistan, the court source said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 According to liberal pansies who claim islamic terrorism is just bi-product of our evil countty's lust for oil (or at least the liberal pansies who admit islamic terrorism is real, not those who think it is make up by the CIA). So why is Spain ( with other war mongers like Canada and Demark) be targeted? Haven't we been through this before? I'm a liberal panty waste but I don't think oil in itself is the cause of terrorism. It is a contributing factor in that it has our people over there in places. Our prescence in the Middle East is causing a backlash, surprise, surprise! There are many causes of terrorism. Its a complicated issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted March 11, 2007 Author Share Posted March 11, 2007 I'm a liberal panty waste I think this the first time in about 55,000 posts you have made sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 I think this the first time in about 55,000 posts you have made sense Am I an inspiration? Maybe someday you will make a post that is somewhat lucid. I won't hold my breath, but anything can happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Since 1492 when the Islamists were thrown out of Spain they've been trying to get back. They are imperialists of the first order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Since 1492 when the Islamists were thrown out of Spain they've been trying to get back.They are imperialists of the first order. That same year the Jews were expelled from Spain. My, how all this ties in together all these years later! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted March 11, 2007 Author Share Posted March 11, 2007 That same year the Jews were expelled from Spain. My, how all this ties in together all these years later! WHen is the a last time you heard someone say the threat "spain will be back under jewish rule", Like Osma's Number 2 has done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 I think this the first time in about 55,000 posts you have made sense Except that it's "panty waist". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted March 11, 2007 Author Share Posted March 11, 2007 Except that it's "panty waist". Why fret over little things like syntax when he is on a roll? I originally said "liberal pansies" but if he wants to elaborate on that thought that's fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 That same year the Jews were expelled from Spain. My, how all this ties in together all these years later! The same year Columbus sailed the ocean blue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Except that it's "panty waist". nope http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?...p;defid=1212107 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted March 11, 2007 Author Share Posted March 11, 2007 nope http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?...p;defid=1212107 cool, so you are: 1) The dried crusty mucus secretion left in girls and women's undergarments, usually resulting from excessive stimulation of the vaginal area. Also known as "clitty litter". or 2) A sissified boy who is afraid of getting hurt and will run away from confrontation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 According to liberal pansies who claim islamic terrorism is just bi-product of our evil country's lust for oil (or at least the liberal pansies who admit islamic terrorism is real, not those who think it is make up by the CIA). What an accurate characterization of liberals! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 A sissified boy who is afraid of getting hurt and will run away from confrontation. Isn't this the definition of democrats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 Isn't this the definition of democrats? Wacka!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 nope http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?...p;defid=1212107 Same dictionary... http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?...y+waist&r=d I'm thinking maybe urbandictionary.com isn't the best source in this case... According to the American Heritage dictionary, it's actually "pantywaist" (no space)...http://www.bartleby.com/61/84/P0048400.html. Same with 11 other dictionaries I just checked...and the etymology of the word correlates nicely with the word's age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 Mike Robetialle usually just says: This ain't a game played in shortpants. It avoids the confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 According to liberal pansies who claim islamic terrorism is just bi-product of our evil country's lust for oil (or at least the liberal pansies who admit islamic terrorism is real, not those who think it is make up by the CIA). Nice straw man, there. So why is Spain ( with other war mongers like Canada and Demark) be targeted? I don't know, why don't you tell me why "they is be" targeted? Hooked on Ebonics worked for me, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 Nice straw man, there. I think we should start awarding straw points. That's if we can get the right-wing xenophobic misogynist anti-constitution segregationists to agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 According to liberal pansies who claim islamic terrorism is just bi-product of our evil country's lust for oil (or at least the liberal pansies who admit islamic terrorism is real, not those who think it is make up by the CIA). So why is Spain ( with other war mongers like Canada and Demark) be targeted? They folded like a tent of the Madrid train bombing years ago and left Iraq: MADRID, Spain (CNN) -- The trial of 11 Pakistani men accused of terrorist activities and conspiracy to carry out attacks in Barcelona was delayed for 24 hours Monday after two defense lawyers said they had not had proper access to their clients. The court had been in session only 15 minutes when Judge Manuela Fernandez ordered the postponement. The trial is being held in a secure basement courtroom at the National Court in central Madrid, with one layer of bulletproof glass separating the public from the court, and the defendants sitting in a bulletproof glass enclosure, except when testifying. The men were arrested in Barcelona in 2004, accused of having links to al Qaeda and plans to attack twin skyscrapers on Barcelona's Mediterranean coast and a shopping center in the city's old port area, according to a copy of the prosecutor's charges, viewed by CNN. Three of the defendants -- Mohammad Afzaal, 42, and Shazad Ali Gutjar, 36, and Aslam Choudry Mohammad, 47 -- are considered prime suspects in the case. Prosecutors want each of the three sentenced to 32 years in prison for their alleged leadership roles in a terrorist group, conspiracy to carry out attacks, drug trafficking and money laundering. The other eight are facing lesser charges and sentences. The trial of all 11 defendants could last about three weeks and a verdict could come later this spring, a court source told CNN. The prosecution alleges that two of the prime suspects transferred thousands of dollars to al Qaeda operatives involved in other attacks. According to the prosecution, Gutjar wired nearly $5,000 in separate transactions in 2004 to Amjad Farooqi and Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan, two men alleged to have ties to the 2002 kidnapping and killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan. A source told CNN that Farooqi is believed to have been involved in the kidnapping that led to the killing of Pearl. Separately, a court source told CNN that Farooqi was killed in a police shootout in Nawasbsha, Pakistan, in September 2004, a month after Gutjar allegedly wired him about $1,200. Khan was arrested by Pakistani police in July 2004, two months after Gutjar allegedly wired him about $3,600, the court source said. The prosecution also said Gutjar transferred more than $13,200 in May 2004 to Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, who has been linked the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Ghailani was arrested two months after the wire transfer in Gujrat, Pakistan, the court source said. To get back to the original topic...it is entirely possible that it's about oil FOR US, but not FOR THEM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts