Yasin's BILLS Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 You may disagree or be critical of my decisions but as this is america i have the freedom to have an opinion also. 1. Lee Evans- obvious reasons he's got great speed and an excellent target to have for any team in the NFL but he's the man. 2. Roscoe Parrish- Short, but could sure fly when he has the ball in his hand and I think its better to have the 2 fastest WR 1 and 2 sort of like Carolina in 2003 with mushin muhammed and steve smith. 3. Peerless Price- Not really the #2 wide reciever and he's not that good on the screen passes and reversals. Thats why I have Roscoe ahead of him because roscoe is faster than him. 4. Josh Reed- No Comments 5. Andre Davis Depth reasons and is quick also but not as fast as roscoe parrish or lee evans
fakeeyed Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 i like parrish as much as the next guy... but lets be serious here. no way is he a #2. we need a larger, stronger body running 2 opposite evans. i have a feeling we find a possible #2 in the draft, but if not... its price. hands down.
billybob Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 I like Parish in the slot- trade up for Calvin Johnson- Johnson, Parish, Evans in a 3 wr set not too shabby.
Yasin's BILLS Posted March 10, 2007 Author Posted March 10, 2007 i like parrish as much as the next guy... but lets be serious here. no way is he a #2. we need a larger, stronger body running 2 opposite evans. i have a feeling we find a possible #2 in the draft, but if not... its price. hands down.So Steve Smith is 5'9 thats not tall either but when he gets the ball in his hand he's gone. Hands down I think he's the best wide reciever in the league. He's the number 1 reciever for the panthers, Keyshawn Johnson doesn't look that tall either but he sucks though never liked him.
Kiwi Bills fan Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 You may disagree or be critical of my decisions but as this is america i have the freedom to have an opinion also. A little defensive, eh? Actually... the NSA would like to have a talk with you. They has serious concerns about why you're not commenting on Josh Reed.
LabattBlue Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 You may disagree or be critical of my decisions but as this is america i have the freedom to have an opinion also. Where did you hear this nonsense?
fakeeyed Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 steve smith? he is one of the best receivers in the league and its laughable to bring him up in this convo. and roscoe is little... smith has 20 pounds on him easy. and keyshawn is 6'4", around 210. so just stop.
Yasin's BILLS Posted March 10, 2007 Author Posted March 10, 2007 you guys want to bash me, the way i see it Im the only person on here that made a depth chart if you don't like you all alright,
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 you guys want to bash me, the way i see it Im the only person on here that made a depth chart if you don't like you all alright, who pissed in your corn flakes?
The Dean Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 you guys want to bash me, the way i see it Im the only person on here that made a depth chart if you don't like you all alright, Easy big fella. If you can't take a little criticism, you're in the wrong place. This place thrives on discussions and, sometimes, disagreements. There are a number of depth charts available. The Bills site usually has one and Bills Daily always has on in play (usually, but not always, current): http://www.billsdaily.com/depthchart/
A Pirate looks at 37 Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 I think you're about right with Evans, Parrish, Reed, but if we get a stronger "go-across-the-middle" type guy, you might see Parrish and Reed drop a spot. Lee's going to need help this season because defenders are going to be on him like Rosie O'Donnell on a buffet line. He's not "our little secret" anymore.
The Dean Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 I think you're about right with Evans, Parrish, Reed, but if we get a stronger "go-across-the-middle" type guy, you might see Parrish and Reed drop a spot. Lee's going to need help this season because defenders are going to be on him like Rosie O'Donnell on a buffet line. He's not "our little secret" anymore. Reed IS that guy, if they would use him that way. And, as an aside, Price actually went across the middle (and took hits...and held on to the ball) last season. Will wonders never cease?
Nanker Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 you guys want to bash me, the way i see it Im the only person on here that made a depth chart if you don't like you all alright, Well, here's another depth chart if you're so interested in them. You might want to keep it around. It could come in handy some day. Start____________________ 1" ____________________ 2" ____________________ 3" ____________________ 4" ____________________ 5" ____________________ 6" ____________________ 7" ____________________
Acantha Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 you guys want to bash me, the way i see it Im the only person on here that made a depth chart if you don't like you all alright, i don't think your right and you may not like that but i think that i am right and you are not so you can just go and say whatever you want.
A Pirate looks at 37 Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 Reed IS that guy, if they would use him that way. And, as an aside, Price actually went across the middle (and took hits...and held on to the ball) last season. Will wonders never cease? Reed is like a mystery (It's a mystery! It's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma!... sorry got a little Joe Pesci there for a minute). He's a mystery to me, he SEEMS to have a lot of talent, but like you said we need to use him that way. I've seen him make the big plays but then all of sudden he vanishes for 3 or 4 games in a row and I actually catch myself wondering what happened to him. I just think we ought to consider either A using Reed as our across the middle "possession guy" or B get someone in here to fill that tole.
K-Gun10 Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 If you dont want to hear peoples opionons why did u post hear?
Yasin's BILLS Posted March 10, 2007 Author Posted March 10, 2007 Sorry for my temper earlier, I didn't mean to do that, I shouldn't have done that on a fellow bills fan, I have been in a bad mood for over a week because I injured my back over a week ago at my work area and the pain is just driving me nuts.
BB2004 Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 You may disagree or be critical of my decisions but as this is america i have the freedom to have an opinion also.1. Lee Evans- obvious reasons he's got great speed and an excellent target to have for any team in the NFL but he's the man. 2. Roscoe Parrish- Short, but could sure fly when he has the ball in his hand and I think its better to have the 2 fastest WR 1 and 2 sort of like Carolina in 2003 with mushin muhammed and steve smith. 3. Peerless Price- Not really the #2 wide reciever and he's not that good on the screen passes and reversals. Thats why I have Roscoe ahead of him because roscoe is faster than him. 4. Josh Reed- No Comments 5. Andre Davis Depth reasons and is quick also but not as fast as roscoe parrish or lee evans I think we all understand that the wide receiver position will probably be addressed in the mid to late rounds, especially if we can find one that Marv likes. At this point I'm not sure why we wouldn't draft a running back and at least 3 defensive players, preferably 2 in the first three rounds.
/dev/null Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 Where did you hear this nonsense? He read it somewhere on or before September 10th, 2001
DanInSouthBuffalo Posted March 11, 2007 Posted March 11, 2007 Terrence Copper of New Orleans in an UFA. He would probably be our #2 or at worst #3 if we could get him. Very underrated. Someone needs to give him a chance.
Recommended Posts