BuffaloBob Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I realize this is coming from a not so reputable source, but PFT reports: McGAHEE TRADE HINGES ON NEW DEAL We were caught up in some day-job stuff earlier today, and we're catching up on the flow of the NFL info. Here's what we know about the McGahee deal, plenty of which is already reported elsewhere. The Ravens sent a third-round pick and a seventh-round pick in 2007 and a third round pick in 2008. The deal hinges on the Ravens working out a long-term extension with McGahee, and the deadline is March 13. Stay tuned. This makes sense. Has anyone else posted this? If so, Sorry about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Reports will trickle out slowly that he has agreeed to a new deal with the Ravens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 If Marv has already done an interview on buffalobills.com about it being a done deal.... then it's a done deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBob Posted March 8, 2007 Author Share Posted March 8, 2007 Reports will trickle out slowly that he has agreeed to a new deal with the Ravens. One would assume that that some numbers were thrown around first between the Ravens and Rosenhaus so that they knew they were in the same ballpark, but should be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBob Posted March 8, 2007 Author Share Posted March 8, 2007 If Marv has already done an interview on buffalobills.com about it being a done deal.... then it's a done deal. I could very easily see that based on a belief that the Ravens and Rosenhaus will work out a deal, and the desire to put it behind them, that Marv would say that it's a done deal even though a contingency still exists. Especially so if no reporter bothered or thought to ask the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 i was going to make a serparate topic but ill just post this here: i think the real intriguing thing left will be seeing how much Willis and Rosenhaus are able to get... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I realize this is coming from a not so reputable source, but PFT reports:This makes sense. Sure does...not at all uncommon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrite Gal Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I realize this is coming from a not so reputable source, but PFT reports:This makes sense. Has anyone else posted this? If so, Sorry about that. This sounds more like they were asleep at the switch or in the potty when the deal went down and they are now offering excuses and trying to do some reporting to pretend their word adds some value for their readers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBob Posted March 8, 2007 Author Share Posted March 8, 2007 This sounds more like they were asleep at the switch or in the potty when the deal went down and they are now offering excuses and trying to do some reporting to pretend their word adds some value for their readers. If this is true, then I suppose adding a specific date by which the contingency must be met can be only be considered as adding a nice theatrical touch to their fantasy value-added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts