Pyrite Gal Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 Trading up seems to be not a good idea unless you are after a specific player to fill a particular need. I do not see any outstanding players in the draft that would justify weakening our selves to get that player.
Benjamin Franklin Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 Bills have plenty of needs that will be met at 12. No need to move.
Original Byrd Man Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 I agree. There is potentially more upside to the higher pick but also more risk. History shows many very good players have come from the 2nd and 3rd rounds, while a great many first rounders never achieve success. Sorry Big Mike!!!
Peter Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 I can see the Bills doing what they did last year -- keeping our own first round pick and trading picks to get another first later in the round.
Koufax Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 yeah, I see too many good players at #12 to give up what it would take to move up. I prefer we stay put and get some great players at each spot. Signing a free agent RB would be nice too (and is going to happen). If we sign a free agent RB, and have Ellison-Crowell-Spikes as the penciled in LBs and Youboty-McGee as the corners and Kyle-Larry-McCargo-Hargrove at DT, we don't have any one position that is wide open and we have to reach for, and we can just improve all of those positions in the best way the draft allows us.
RayFinkle Posted March 8, 2007 Posted March 8, 2007 Bills have too many needs, but then I thought that last year and Marv moved up to take McCargo and, well, needless to say, we still have a need at the position. I hope we just stay put and get more bodies.
Recommended Posts