Pass the Pipe Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Why no visit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2003Contenders Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Why no visit? 1. He is a thug 2. He drops too many passes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 1. He is a thug2. He drops too many passes You left out wife beater. Or is that a subset of thug? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeF Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 You left out wife beater. Or is that a subset of thug? You know -- I was a big critic of McMichael--but Rhodes actually has an incident of "significant other" abuse and now a DUI...if we are moving down this path..why not give Randy McMichael a look. With the presumption that our TE's can actually be part of the passing game instead of the pass blocking scheme now on most plays--he could be a great weapon. Standard would be -- one incident and he is gone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 You know -- I was a big critic of McMichael--but Rhodes actually has an incident of "significant other" abuse and now a DUI...if we are moving down this path..why not give Randy McMichael a look. With the presumption that our TE's can actually be part of the passing game instead of the pass blocking scheme now on most plays--he could be a great weapon. Standard would be -- one incident and he is gone... I think he is a multiple offender on the domestic front. I know of 2 such incidents since he has been with the Fish. Pass on him. He is a cry baby and when he does get the ball thrown his way he drops a hell of alot more than he catches. Plus he does not block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 You left out wife beater. Or is that a subset of thug? One can be a thug yet not a wife beater...a wife beater is by definition also a thug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 One can be a thug yet not a wife beater...a wife beater is by definition also a thug. Not really. A guy can go and rob stores and steal cars, but when he goes home he could be the nicest guy in the world to his old lady. A guy that hits a women is nothing more than a piece of shieiit coward, which fits the mold for the fins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 You know -- I was a big critic of McMichael--but Rhodes actually has an incident of "significant other" abuse and now a DUI...if we are moving down this path..why not give Randy McMichael a look. With the presumption that our TE's can actually be part of the passing game instead of the pass blocking scheme now on most plays--he could be a great weapon. Standard would be -- one incident and he is gone... I believe McMichael's wife was pregnant when he beat her. This definitely makes it a worse offense in my book. I believe there was more than one occasion with him as well. By the way was there a pun intended in his being a great "weapon"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 One can be a thug yet not a wife beater...a wife beater is by definition also a thug. Damn, that sounds like a question for the SAT's or Wonderlic test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeBillsDrive Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I believe McMichael's wife was pregnant when he beat her. This definitely makes it a worse offense in my book. I believe there was more than one occasion with him as well. By the way was there a pun intended in his being a great "weapon"? Let him be a Fins problem not a Bills problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Not really. A guy can go and rob stores and steal cars, but when he goes home he could be the nicest guy in the world to his old lady. A guy that hits a women is nothing more than a piece of shieiit coward, which fits the mold for the fins. Umm...I think you just said the same thing I said, but in a much less cogent way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts