JinWPB Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 The Bill's interactive depth chart seems very up to date. Where is John McCargo? I know is was on IR but wasn't Crowell also, he's there. I'm sure it's just a oversight ,or is it? Hmmmm.
VABills Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 The Bill's interactive depth chart seems very up to date. Where is John McCargo? I know is was on IR but wasn't Crowell also, he's there. I'm sure it's just a oversight ,or is it? Hmmmm. Yeah they also have Shelton at FB, even though he was cut, and Langston as a reserve even though with that contract he will start. Don't pay it no mind. It isn't right.
JinWPB Posted March 6, 2007 Author Posted March 6, 2007 Yeah they also have Shelton at FB, even though he was cut, and Langston as a reserve even though with that contract he will start. Don't pay it no mind. It isn't right. Yeah I know but this time of year its fun to "stir the pot" a little.
BuffaloBilliever Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 AHHHHHHHHH OH NOES!? FIRST ROUNDER GONE!!!! HEAD FOR THE HILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ... Yeah I noticed too...
silvermike Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 I don't think that Dick Jauron controls the offseason depth chart on the website. I think that's just sort of thrown together.
ThreeBillsDrive Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 I don't think that Dick Jauron controls the offseason depth chart on the website. I think that's just sort of thrown together. Agreed, I wouldn't read too much into it.
stuckincincy Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 Depth charts are generally alphabetized until the positions are firmed up. We talk about this year after year...
Matt in KC Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 If they're targetting Okoye in the draft, they'd better get McCargo back up there quick so they don't inadvertently exaggerate our DT need to all of the teams who only research their opponents on the web....
ROCCEO Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 If they're targetting Okoye in the draft, they'd better get McCargo back up there quick so they don't inadvertently exaggerate our DT need to all of the teams who only research their opponents on the web.... LOL matt in dc Also, they have duke preston starting at RG, which I pray to god doesnt happen unless the Duke really turns it on in the offseason. Something tells me the duke is best suited as a backup though.
Matt in KC Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 LOL matt in dc Also, they have duke preston starting at RG, which I pray to god doesnt happen unless the Duke really turns it on in the offseason. Something tells me the duke is best suited as a backup though. I agree. I'm worried Duke will "get his shot" this year with us upgrading LG, RT and depth. But, I haven't seen anything to make me think he's up to the challenge. I think he's a good backup, but a weak starter who is already peaking.
Recommended Posts