Tipster19 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 With Jones to Jets, McGahee's stock just took a turn for the better. http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/footbal...story?track=rss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkady Renko Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Only problem is that the Bills will need a RB themselves once they trade McGahee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher Capolupo Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Only problem is that the Bills will need a RB themselves once they trade McGahee. maybe we can talk ricky waters out of retirement... haha, I can't help but to laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Only problem is that the Bills will need a RB themselves once they trade McGahee. Not a problem. We can get at least two picks for McGahee, including a first, which we can package to trade to the Raiders for the first pick in the draft, where we can pick the best RB available, who's sure to be a future Hall-of-Famer...and Marv's senile for even considering it, since an RB with the first pick is a reach when Brady Quinn's still on the board... Did I miss any TSW cliches? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeBillsDrive Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Only problem is that the Bills will need a RB themselves once they trade McGahee. yup, and I'm not sure the A-train is an adequate replacement. I know DJ likes him. But he's less patient than Willis in allowing holes to develop. One thing for certain: Willis is optimally positioned for success in '07: Final year of contract -- he'll work his @ss off Beefed up line that will drive more holes open for him next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher Capolupo Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Not a problem. We can get at least two picks for McGahee, including a first, which we can package to trade to the Raiders for the first pick in the draft, where we can pick the best RB available, who's sure to be a future Hall-of-Famer...and Marv's senile for even considering it, since an RB with the first pick is a reach when Brady Quinn's still on the board...Did I miss any TSW cliches? OK, I know your kidding.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Not a problem. We can get at least two picks for McGahee, including a first, which we can package to trade to the Raiders for the first pick in the draft, where we can pick the best RB available, who's sure to be a future Hall-of-Famer...and Marv's senile for even considering it, since an RB with the first pick is a reach when Brady Quinn's still on the board...Did I miss any TSW cliches? Just one. " Our Defence is the worst in the NFL on March 5th " Do you think we'll win tomorrow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob2232 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Really, How So? Buffalo - McGahee Miami - R. Williams/R. Brown New England - Maroney Jets - Thomas Jones Colts - Addai Tennessee - Open (White?) Jacksonville - Jones Drew Houston - A.Green Steelers-Parker Browns-Open (Droughns?) Cincinatti - Rudi Johnson Baltimore - Open (Lewis?) San Diego - LT Kansas City - LJ Denver - Henry Oakland - Lamont Jordan Philly - Westbrook Dallas - Jones/Barber III Giants - Open (Jacobs?) Redskins - Dillon Chicago - Benson Green Bay - Open Detroit - k. Jones/T. Bell Minnesota - Taylor NO - Bush/McCalister Carolina - Foster/D. Williams Atlanta - Dunn/Norwood Tampa - Cadillac Seattle - Alexander San Fran - Gore St. Louis - Jackson Arizona - Edge That means, teams that need a RB 1. Giants 2. Tennessee 3. Green Bay 4. Cleveland 5. Baltimore 6. Tampa Bay (I'll throw them in here) 7. Buffalo (Also throw them in due to losing mcgahee to make this feasible) So thats it. 7 teams. What RBs are available? 1. Willis McGahee 2. Cadillac Williams 3. Jamal Lewis 4. Adrian Peterson 5. Marshawn Lynch 6. Micheal Bush 7. Kenny Irons 8. Chris Brown 9. Corey Dillon 10. Ruben Droughns 11. Correll Buchalter 12. Ladell Betts 13. Dominick Rhodes 14. Micheal Turner 15. Kevin Barlow 16. Fred Taylor 17. Anthony Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koufax Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Here's the simpler answer: We don't need a RB. So we only give up Willis McGahee if we can get better by doing it (not going to happen), and not because Marv doesn't like him. Willis will be a very good Bill this year, and we will have to get a new RB next spring for the 2008 season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMIEBUF12 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Just one. " Our Defence is the worst in the NFL on March 5th " Do you think we'll win tomorrow? we are still gonna draft a bunch of defensive players starting with paul posluszny.willis will be eating humble pie after seeing he had zero interest from what turned out to be alot of teams trading and signing runningbacks.this was definately unusual this season with all the wheeling and dealing for runningbacks.i think when marv sits drew rosenhaus down and says look we couldn't even get a second round pick for "the self proclaimed best runningback in football"drew will then turn to willis and tell him to knock off the crap and rededicate himself to football so that drew can get willis "paid" in 2008.after this happens we will not have to burn a day 1 pick on a runningback..thus enabling the bills to focus on this defensive rich draft this year.go bills in"07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsVet Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Here's the simpler answer: We don't need a RB. So we only give up Willis McGahee if we can get better by doing it (not going to happen), and not because Marv doesn't like him. Willis will be a very good Bill this year, and we will have to get a new RB next spring for the 2008 season. Willis should be at least satisfied that he'll have hopefully one the best left sides in the NFL to run behind. If anything, this could make him look better than he really is and increase his stock when the 2008 FA period begins. Marv is not the type who would get rid of the starter and have someone like A Train as the starter. He knows better, hopefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Gun10 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Willis should be at least satisfied that he'll have hopefully one the best left sides in the NFL to run behind. If anything, this could make him look better than he really is and increase his stock when the 2008 FA period begins. Marv is not the type who would get rid of the starter and have someone like A Train as the starter. He knows better, hopefully. Except A-train isnt on the roster hes a free agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts