bartshan-83 Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 Not one player on this team has more than 1 sack. We have allowed 4 different guys to sack Drew more than once in a single game. Game IS won in the trenches. Always has been, always will be.
SDS Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 BART at ND said: Not one player on this team has more than 1 sack. 66048[/snapback] This is a bad thing? More than one would be a tad freaky wouldn't?
R. Rich Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 The mountain is at One Bills Drive. Go tell it there.
Bill from NYC Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 You are simply on fire today with your posts.
stevestojan Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 SDS said: This is a bad thing? More than one would be a tad freaky wouldn't? 66053[/snapback] A seperate sack for each jewel? Now THAT would be somethin'
bartshan-83 Posted October 11, 2004 Author Posted October 11, 2004 R. Rich said: The mountain is at One Bills Drive. Go tell it there. 66057[/snapback]
bartshan-83 Posted October 11, 2004 Author Posted October 11, 2004 SDS said: This is a bad thing? More than one would be a tad freaky wouldn't? 66053[/snapback] Well in those terms, I think our team is totally devoid of sacks...or at least whats supposed to be in em.
R. Rich Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 BART at ND said: 66071[/snapback] It means you're preaching to the choir. Donahoe is the one who needs enlightenment.
drnykterstein Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 BART at ND said: Not one player on this team has more than 1 sack. We have allowed 4 different guys to sack Drew more than once in a single game. Game IS won in the trenches. Always has been, always will be. 66048[/snapback] well when aaron schobel is yoru best DE your not going to get sacks. they guy sucks he cant get pressure. but hey we signed him for the next 18 years and the bills fans all love him. so we dont need sacks. we got aaron schobel
Recommended Posts