TPS Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 Apparently the Bush Administration has fueled insurgencies in more than Iraq... Insurgents everywhere
IBTG81 Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 Apparently the Bush Administration has fueled insurgencies in more than Iraq... Insurgents everywhere 65830[/snapback] You sadly wish the insurgents were winning.
blzrul Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 Hey Ed, you're a young guy and purportedly educated too, why aren't you over there making sure the insurgents aren't winning?
TPS Posted October 11, 2004 Author Posted October 11, 2004 Sadley, you idiotically decided to comment on my title without reading the article.
Rich in Ohio Posted October 11, 2004 Posted October 11, 2004 You sadly wish the insurgents were winning. 65914[/snapback] Isn't it sad to see such haters. The wishful thinking on his part is shameful.
TPS Posted October 12, 2004 Author Posted October 12, 2004 Your's and Ed's comments say a lot about how you guys form your thoughts and opinions. Ed makes a judgement about me from the title of my post without reading the article, and you accept his judgement without reading the article, and ignore my admonishment to him about not reading the article. The title of my post is based upon an analogy mentioned by the WSJ in the article that the Bush administration is fighting two insurgencies: one in Iraq, and one in the CIA. From now on I will label my titles for their degree of difficulty: Richio for the lowest degree of comprehension necessary, DCTom for the highest....
Thurman's Helmet Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Insurgents or "Freedom Fighters" are winning. YAY!!!!!! Sincerely, the left
IBTG81 Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Hey Ed, you're a young guy and purportedly educated too, why aren't you over there making sure the insurgents aren't winning? 65956[/snapback] If there were a draft and the military needed me, I'd go. I'm also 6'3", 260. Quite a large target and not the fastest moving person in the world.
_BiB_ Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 If there were a draft and the military needed me, I'd go. I'm also 6'3", 260. Quite a large target and not the fastest moving person in the world. 66271[/snapback] Kevlar man, Kevlar.
Generation ME Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Isn't that the UK's version of The Onion ?
DC Tom Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Quite a large target and not the fastest moving person in the world. 66271[/snapback] That's okay. Large, slow targets like yourself have their place. They keep the other soldiers safe. Anyone else have an image of Ed in boot camp looking like Pvt. Pyle in "Full Metal Jacket"?
_BiB_ Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 That's okay. Large, slow targets like yourself have their place. They keep the other soldiers safe. Anyone else have an image of Ed in boot camp looking like Pvt. Pyle in "Full Metal Jacket"? 67059[/snapback] I AM in a world of stevestojan!
erynthered Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 Hey Ed, you're a young guy and purportedly educated too, why aren't you over there making sure the insurgents aren't winning? If there were a draft and the military needed me, I'd go. I'm also 6'3", 260. Quite a large target and not the fastest moving person in the world. 66271[/snapback] She's purportedly educated too Ed
blzrul Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 So there we have it, Ed's a chickenhawk, plain and simple. I'm shocked. Not.
DC Tom Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 So there we have it, Ed's a chickenhawk, plain and simple. I'm shocked. Not. 67179[/snapback] No, he's purportedly [sic] a chickenhawk. Though technically, he's not as bad a "purported" chicken hawk as the top 60% of the 40% of the casualties in the first three years of Vietnam...
KD in CA Posted October 12, 2004 Posted October 12, 2004 She's purportedly educated too Ed 67133[/snapback] Ooooh.....I thought she was POORLY educated. Damn, I had it wrong all this time!
Recommended Posts