John from Riverside Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 If he can play at all he was a bargain: Bills | Whittle signs one-year pact Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:44:55 -0800 ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Buffalo Bills have signed free-agent OL Jason Whittle (Vikings) to a one-year deal. The contract includes a $720,000 base salary and $40,000 signing bonus
In space no one can hear Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 If he can play at all he was a bargain: Bills | Whittle signs one-year pact Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:44:55 -0800 ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Buffalo Bills have signed free-agent OL Jason Whittle (Vikings) to a one-year deal. The contract includes a $720,000 base salary and $40,000 signing bonus A $40,000 signing bonus? LOL!! He needs to contact Terrance McGee for financial advice!
OnTheRocks Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 good thing they got that deal done 45 minutes into free agency. someone might have out bid the Bills.
Kelly the Dog Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 good thing they got that deal done 45 minutes into free agency. someone might have out bid the Bills. Actually, there are reports from league offices that say the Bills had a coupon.
keepthefaith Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 If he can play at all he was a bargain: Bills | Whittle signs one-year pact Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:44:55 -0800 ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Buffalo Bills have signed free-agent OL Jason Whittle (Vikings) to a one-year deal. The contract includes a $720,000 base salary and $40,000 signing bonus If you like the guy, sign him for more than a year. Especially at these numbers.
eball Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 At those numbers, he certainly doesn't whittle away much of the Bills' cap. Thank you, thank you very much. I'm here all week; don't forget to tip the wait staff.
Sketch Soland Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 Actually, there are reports from league offices that say the Bills had a coupon. The opening hour of free agency was "double coupon" hour.
Mark Long Beach Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 Considering how thin we are on the OL, almost any signing is a good one. He's versatile and good depth. Doesn't cost us much to keep him or to cut him. Sounds reasonable to me.
Recommended Posts