Chicken Wing '73 Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 Sorry if this posted already. I didn't see it. http://buffalobills.com/news/news.jsp?news_id=4643
apuszczalowski Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 Sorry if this posted already. I didn't see it. http://buffalobills.com/news/news.jsp?news_id=4643 Not sure on this one, I kinda have mixed feelings. He sounds like he could be an upgrade, and might be a good signing but He was a Raiders Linemen so.......................................
BuffBills#1 Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 I wouldn't mind a big guy like this competing with Pennington for the RT spot. We need to get two major upgrades at both guard positions though. I'm hoping we can land Dockery and Jake Scott.
LynchMob23 Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 To be fair, the rest of the NFL says our line sucks, but Jason Peters is good...
kgun Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 Yeahhh!!! Let's make our line better and TRADE our featured back.......Yeaaaaaaa
In space no one can hear Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 lINK Follow the link to his career stats.
jri111 Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 courtsey of scouts Inc... 2006 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc. Grade: 68 | Key Alert: None Comment: Walker is gigantic and moves well for his size. He has starting experience at tackle and guard. He has an ideal frame at tackle: great height, very good bulk and long arms. He has the lateral mobility to slide and mirror. He can redirect and recover if beaten. He even can pull from the guard position. His size forces defenders to take an extra step to get around his edge. He is quick enough off the ball and can get to the second level and get position. He is powerful, plays with a very wide base and can engulf defenders off the snap. But Walker is very inconsistent. He takes some plays off and looks bad or disinterested. He catches defenders too often, instead of striking. He sometimes overextends instead of moving his feet. He can be slow to recognize blitzes and stunts. His competitiveness and toughness are concerns. by the way, 68 is in the range of "average starter" which runs from 60-69. A grade of 70 is the low end of "good starter" so, a small reason for optimism? I remember last year all the FA's we picked up were in the "good backup" or "adequate backup" ratings and we were projecting them as starters... for what it's worth...
Billsjunkie Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 At least there bringing guys in. I swear some of you want them to trade for every all pro lineman out there. There just not to be had this FA period.
2003Contenders Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 This guy was probably also a victim of Gallery's miserable failure at LT. The Raiders will have to move Gallery back to RT, which makes Walker expendable. If he can be had for limited funds -- and is capable of playing adequately, maybe not such a bad deal -- even if he is being relied upon as a starter.
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted March 2, 2007 Posted March 2, 2007 Another OL guy that can play two positions, works for me. If he beats out Pennington and Butler fine, if he beats out Preston or Reyes fine, if not he's a solid 3rd tackle who has experience lining up at TE in jumbo packages. I'm just not feeling the "spend huge dollars on guards vibe" Minnesota tried that and Hutchinson was pretty disappointing, not nearly as good as his massive cap number. We need bodies with Gandy unrestricted and Villarrial gone. We were looing to upgrade already so at minimum we need to replace the two we already lost, if you want to supplant people that's even more people to sign. We only have so many draft picks. Even if we DO sign someone like Dielman or Stienbach we need a backup for him.
Recommended Posts