K-Gun10 Posted February 23, 2007 Posted February 23, 2007 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2775683 its a shock to me i thought garrard would start? what do u guys think?
CarolinaBills Posted February 23, 2007 Posted February 23, 2007 I think they are keeping the wrong one.
In space no one can hear Posted February 23, 2007 Posted February 23, 2007 I think they are keeping the wrong one. I think BOTH of them are the wrong one.
Captain Hindsight Posted February 23, 2007 Posted February 23, 2007 I always thought leftwich was decent and better than gerrard, but your right neither one is great
ROCCEO Posted February 23, 2007 Posted February 23, 2007 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2775683 its a shock to me i thought garrard would start? what do u guys think? Yeah I thought that prior to last season when they DID start Garrard for a bunch of games. The guy is just a quality backup, by no means a lock to be "starter material". Leftwich is not great either but I see the ability, although Im not so sure they'll ever maximize his potential in Jax.
SACTOBILLSFAN Posted February 23, 2007 Posted February 23, 2007 They both suck and both should be free agents.
obie_wan Posted February 23, 2007 Posted February 23, 2007 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2775683 its a shock to me i thought garrard would start? what do u guys think? I think they named him the starter to increase his trade value so they put a package together to send him to the Raiders for Randy Moss and picks based on the input of that genius Mike Tice.
K-Gun10 Posted February 23, 2007 Author Posted February 23, 2007 I think they named him the starter to increase his trade value so they put a package together to send him to the Raiders for Randy Moss and picks based on the input of that genius Mike Tice. That could make sense i can see mike tice and moss back together and jags really need a reciever.
Recommended Posts