DeLuca1967 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 My name's Duhlewka. I eat stuff off the floor. I'd live upstairs from you. If my IQ was above four. If you hear something trite, Some kind of blather. some kind of blight Just don't ask me what it was Just don't ask me what it was Just don't ask me what it was I think it's because I'm clumsy I try not to talk too proud Maybe it's because I'm crazy A douche bag, I am avowed. When I was a child, I was often brushed aside. Because their arms got tired, They only hit until I cried And after that I now constantly ask why Just because I want to argue some more Just because I want to argue some more Just because I want to argue some more Still well on your way to 30,000 meaningless posts I see. You are still my hero.
firstngoal Posted February 16, 2007 Author Posted February 16, 2007 Please explain to me how this years schedule is tougher then playing the 13-3 Bears, the 14-2 Chargers, the 13-3 Ravens, the 12-4 Pats TWICE, and the 12-4 Super Bowl Champion Colts last year. What makes any of the NFC East teams tough for 2007? Giants: No Tiki, defense soft, Eli overrated... Redskins: Average team at best next year Cowboys: Paper tigers Eagles: Good solid team, but hardly unbeatable... Bengals: Prove it before I believe the hype... Steelers: Losig Cowher, 1st year HC...who knows what to expect... Enlighten me. Ok we played playoff teams 6 times counting the Patsies in 2006. In 2007 we could will be playing as many as 12 playoff teams (if you count the Pats and Jets that's 4 teams). We also have Cincy, Dallas, Denver and Baltimore at Home plus Philly, Wash who will be much improved and tough at home, Jacksonviile super tough at home and Pittsburgh looking to bounce back and another toughie on the schedule. 12 Playoff teams is twice the amount we played last season according to my math. You have just been enlightened!
Cornerville Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 What amazes me is how Deluca only seems to appear during down times or a losing streak or a bad loss, or if WGR takes time out of their busy day of talking about old shows and talks negatively about the Bills, then poof, he is Mr. Doom and Gloom Delucs in the flesh!. But when the Bills are going well, he is AWOL. Right there that is grounds for going on the ignore list.
34-78-83 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 Still well on your way to 30,000 meaningless posts I see. You are still my hero. How ironic, A calling out for "30,000 meaningless posts" made by a member who is largely ignored by all but maybe 3 members on this site.
Cornerville Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 How ironic, A calling out for "30,000 meaningless posts" made by a member who is largely ignored by all but maybe 3 members on this site. If I am one of the 3....make it 2 now.
DeLuca1967 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 How ironic, A calling out for "30,000 meaningless posts" made by a member who is largely ignored by all but maybe 3 members on this site. People fear opinions that contradict their own. They prefer to live in a bubble where all is wonderful. Losman is a Pro Bowl QB. Willis is a great guy and a great running back and Marv is a great GM. It's funny how so many were quick to attack Simon and White's opinions of the press conference. Simon and White have been the two biggest homers for the Bills next to Brad Riter. As soon as their opinions don't match they suddenly become "morons". Thats' why reading posts on this board is more entertaining than any comedy on TV.
DeLuca1967 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 What amazes me is how Deluca only seems to appear during down times or a losing streak or a bad loss, or if WGR takes time out of their busy day of talking about old shows and talks negatively about the Bills, then poof, he is Mr. Doom and Gloom Delucs in the flesh!. But when the Bills are going well, he is AWOL. Right there that is grounds for going on the ignore list. This board was started in 1996? So I haven't had a chance to post when things "are going well".
ganesh Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 IMarv also made it sound like the Bills aren't too interested in making a big splash in free-agency but he sounded like they will go out and sign a few Robert Royals instead. I would be happy if they get a Robert Royals type player rather than investing money in like a Peerless Price. Royals was pretty good for the bills last year.
Cornerville Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 People fear opinions that contradict their own. They prefer to live in a bubble where all is wonderful. Losman is a Pro Bowl QB. Willis is a great guy and a great running back and Marv is a great GM. It's funny how so many were quick to attack Simon and White's opinions of the press conference. Simon and White have been the two biggest homers for the Bills next to Brad Riter. As soon as their opinions don't match they suddenly become "morons". Thats' why reading posts on this board is more entertaining than any comedy on TV. How many people here really say that Losman is a Pro Bowl QB, and Willis is a GREAT QB and Marv is a GREAT GM?? Have you been reading the posts about Willis over the last two months? I would say the majority of posters here just feel that the team showed some progress this past year, the Bills are one of the younger teams in the NFL and are hoping for a solid offseason and perhaps make a push for a playoff spot.
34-78-83 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 People fear opinions that contradict their own. They prefer to live in a bubble where all is wonderful. Losman is a Pro Bowl QB. Willis is a great guy and a great running back and Marv is a great GM. It's funny how so many were quick to attack Simon and White's opinions of the press conference. Simon and White have been the two biggest homers for the Bills next to Brad Riter. As soon as their opinions don't match they suddenly become "morons". Thats' why reading posts on this board is more entertaining than any comedy on TV. What does that have to do with what I said? There are more negatively skewed posters here than there are positive ones, and most all of them likely roll their eyes when they see some of your doom and gloom posts, or posts that are flat out wrong that you won't let go of even after being proven wrong, and you are trying to explain to me what a homer is?
K-Gun10 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 marv seemed excited about trying crowell at mlb.
Cornerville Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 This board was started in 1996? So I haven't had a chance to post when things "are going well". You are a miserable fan. Welcome to ignore world.
DeLuca1967 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 What does that have to do with what I said? There are more negatively skewed posters here than there are positive ones, and most all of them likely roll their eyes when they see some of your doom and gloom posts, or posts that are flat out wrong that you won't let go of even after being proven wrong, and you are trying to explain to me what a homer is? Everything. There is such a mob mentality when it comes to those of us who don't think the Bills are on the right path. To offer any opinion other than what the masses think gets "ignored". Yet posters who are far more negative like Ramius or Darrin are accepted because the focus of their negativity is against those who don't agree with the Bills. You can't take anything else away from the press conference than that Marv doesn't know anything about being an NFL GM. Anyone who agrees with this will be attacked.
daquixers_is_back Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 sounds a lot like the new england patriots approach - and boy, do they suck The Patriots already had a good offensive line, HOF backup QB, and an all-star secondary featuring Ty-Law when they started their approach.
daquixers_is_back Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 One of the funnier parts of the press-conference: "... at their final meeting, and I said 'fellas, our objective isn't to go to the super bowl. its to win the super bowl.' And uhm ... maybe those aren't very good words coming from a guy who has gone and hasnt ... uh ... hasnt had that result" (laughs)
DeLuca1967 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 The Patriots already had a good offensive line, HOF backup QB, and an all-star secondary featuring Ty-Law when they started their approach. That's good. Since the Bills have all those things already
generaLee83 Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 Just heard the audio and it basically sounds like they told Marv 5 minutes before the press conference started that he was going to have a press conference. He chose his words carefully and was speaking in very general terms. Obivously Marv's duties have no connection with the cap economics. I've got no problem with that. Cash to the cap means that they will spend up $109 million this year which includes all signing bonuses, roster bonuses.....etc.....this team will not be handing out massive bonuses to one player. That makes me a little angry that they probably won't be making a play for Eric Steinbach and the SD lineman whose name escapes me. This off-season will probably be low profile and somehow I'm not very optimistic about playoffs for this coming season. I think you've nailed it, I'm strongly reconsidering my season tickets at this point.
BUFFALOTONE Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 Everything. There is such a mob mentality when it comes to those of us who don't think the Bills are on the right path. To offer any opinion other than what the masses think gets "ignored". Yet posters who are far more negative like Ramius or Darrin are accepted because the focus of their negativity is against those who don't agree with the Bills. You can't take anything else away from the press conference than that Marv doesn't know anything about being an NFL GM. Anyone who agrees with this will be attacked. I respect your point of view, but my question is why do you believe that hte Bills are not going in a positive direction? Instead of just bashing give me recutible reasons why..
daquixers_is_back Posted February 16, 2007 Posted February 16, 2007 I think you've nailed it, I'm strongly reconsidering my season tickets at this point. Be prepared to be called a fair-weather fan.
Recommended Posts