/dev/null Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Runs like Hayes, hits like Mays? Well you may run like Mays, but you hit like Stojan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Balls Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Says the guy whose last contribution to a thread on PPP was posting quotes from the movie "Major League." I was trying to figure out where that came from. No, I've never seen Major League. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 No, I've never seen Major League. you're dead to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 That is complete horseshit. The First Amendment was NOT intended to cover the actions of private organizations, whether they cross state lines or not. Unless they found some sort of FCC involvement where Clear Channel was specifically told to boycott the Dixie Chicks (doubtful...but I've heard it expressed as a popular conspiracy theory), the First Amendment doesn't even begin to apply. And yes, the Senate hearings may have said otherwise. But anyone who's read my posts in the past knows what I think of Congressional investigations. All the hearings tell me is that they don't have even the merest understanding of what the First Amendment actually means. When I read this, I thought to myself, why on earth is a post this good coming from Bungee Jumper? You kept up the high quality of posts for a few pages, I'll give you credit there. But then you started throwing unfounded insults at Molson and Oliver. And I thought to myself, yep, that's the Bungee Jumper that I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 When I read this, I thought to myself, why on earth is a post this good coming from Bungee Jumper? You kept up the high quality of posts for a few pages, I'll give you credit there. But then you started throwing unfounded insults at Molson and Oliver. And I thought to myself, yep, that's the Bungee Jumper that I know. in one single day you've defended both molson and doucheluca, 2 of the biggest retards on this shorts bus. you;re not doing yourself any favors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 in one single day you've defended both molson and doucheluca, 2 of the biggest retards on this shorts bus. you;re not doing yourself any favors. A shorts bus. Is that a bus where you're not allowed to wear long pants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted February 17, 2007 Share Posted February 17, 2007 When I read this, I thought to myself, why on earth is a post this good coming from Bungee Jumper? You kept up the high quality of posts for a few pages, I'll give you credit there. But then you started throwing unfounded insults at Molson and Oliver. And I thought to myself, yep, that's the Bungee Jumper that I know. Are you stalking me? Get a hobby... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 So I'm doing my usual 7:00 AM news site surfing today, and I'm seeing a ton of "Defiant Dixie Chicks" type of headlines. On top of that these stories seem to have the common theme that the Dixie Chicks were somehow censored and their constitutional right to freedom of speech was violated. Could someone please let the press know that an artist who says something that pi$$es off 50% of their core fan base, and then those fans choosing to ignore that artist's product, is neither censorship nor is it a violation of 1st amendment rights? My fiancee, who likes the Dixie Chicks, didn't seem to think they deserved 5 grammys, although she said it was their best album yet. I'm not much of a fan (I think the lead singer has a pig face and she rubs me the wrong way. I would like the other two to just rub me... ) and I have to wonder how much the controversy they have created impacted their nominations/awards. Not that I think the grammys are a measurement of anything that resembles artistic merit. (*Cough* *Sham!* *Cough*..) I don't think their new stuff is all that good- I do like their old stuff- and Natalie Maines is by far the best looking of the three, hands down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted February 18, 2007 Share Posted February 18, 2007 Are you stalking me? Get a hobby... I see that in your world, making a comment about your posts=stalking. That's no more insane than some of the other stuff I've seen you post on these boards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Are you stalking me? Get a hobby... C'mon, couldn't you just hear the James Taylor in the background? "You've got a friend...Ain't it good to know..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts