Bungee Jumper Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Dank and his Lackawanna kin are going to hunt you down. ...but you'll hear the duelling banjos coming in plenty of time to escape... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 This is turning into a nice, old-fashioned thread hijacking. Cool... I didn't start that. Pardon me if I can't sit by every time Artest gets mentioned for year after year. Also pardon me if I find it funny that you think JHC is Ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Dank and his Lackawanna kin are going to hunt you down. Or he'll steal your identity, but it won't really be theft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 True. Most people probably think "The Raven" was nothing more than a Simpson's Halloween episode. I thought it was a movie starring Brandon Lee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 The problem is that the poe references would be lost on everyone but the 5 people that actually have picked up a book sometime in the last 10 years. You know that was written more then 10 years ago, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 You know that was written more then 10 years ago, right? Yeah. It's more like 300 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Or he'll steal your identity, but it won't really be theft. thats because since you didnt really take someone's physical driver's license, its not theft. Its "Identity infringement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 This is turning into a nice, old-fashioned thread hijacking. Cool... "The needs of the ieatcrayonz outweigh the needs of the many." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartshan-83 Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Decent thread. 6 out of 10 on the b.harami scale. Loses points for: - not enough censored words - rehashed topic (see People v. Tracy Lee) - only a minor meltdown But still better than these parts have seen in a long time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 You know that was written more then 10 years ago, right? It was? sh--. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Yeah. It's more like 300 years ago. 1845, so about 162 years ago, which was in the 19th century. Since this is the 21st century it was 2 centuries ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 1845, so about 162 years ago, which was in the 19th century. Since this is the 21st century it was 2 centuries ago. You're right...200 years. Either that, or a century's 81 years long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 You're right...200 years. Either that, or a century's 81 years long. or 21 - 19 = 2, at least in my world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 You're right...200 years. Either that, or a century's 81 years long. If it's 200 years, in one year, that will make three centuries, so you were really pretty close with your original guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Decent thread. 6 out of 10 on the b.harami scale. Loses points for: - not enough censored words - rehashed topic (see People v. Tracy Lee) - only a minor meltdown But still better than these parts have seen in a long time... It jumps to a 9 on the b.harami scale the moment someone gets banned or suspended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartshan-83 Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 It jumps to a 9 on the b.harami scale the moment someone gets banned or suspended. Agreed. It is so ordered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 It jumps to a 9 on the b.harami scale the moment someone gets banned or suspended. And a 10 when said retard goes to the overly colorful board to B word about how they were wronged and ganged up on and the mods let it happen to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Decent thread. 6 out of 10 on the b.harami scale. Loses points for: - not enough censored words - rehashed topic (see People v. Tracy Lee) - only a minor meltdown But still better than these parts have seen in a long time... That John Adams always had a gift for pissing people off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 That John Adams always had a gift for pissing people off. !@#$ you you bloated womanizing pig. If you loved France, you would have loved Lackawanna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 And a 10 when said retard goes to the overly colorful board to B word about how they were wronged and ganged up on and the mods let it happen to them. "Thank you, Nazi". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts