Maguire's Beer Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Dawgg said: Again, it was the right call. He was in bounds the entire time and got pushed out. Anyone who thinks otherwise after the replays is simply jealous that the Pats are a great team and the Bills, over the past many years, have sucked. Of course we're jealous, genius. That's part of being a sports fan. Hate and jealousy are as much elements of fandom as any other emotions.
agilen Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 What nobody seemed to talk about was the awful hold on I believe Freeny before brady even threw the ball. The o-lineman ripped his freakin helmet off. Should have been a 10 yard penalty.
bills44 Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 agilen said: What nobody seemed to talk about was the awful hold on I believe Freeny before brady even threw the ball. The o-lineman ripped his freakin helmet off. Should have been a 10 yard penalty. Matt Light never holds. He kept Merriman away from Brady last week with completely clean and legal blocks.
OCinBuffalo Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 The irony is magificent - Pats have gone to the luck well one to many times. Sooner or later it comes back to bite u.
Ramius Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Well, looks like the patsie-fags arent the only team with the "fumble the ball to the OL in the endzone for a TD" play.
KD in CA Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Wow..that's not supposed to happen! I always liked Jeff Saturday in college...wish the Bills had drafted him.
Maguire's Beer Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Ramius said: Well, looks like the patsies arent the only team with the "fumble the ball to the OL in the endzone for a TD" play. Could this be . . . a lucky break for a Pats opponent? Have the football gods decided to shine light on the Colts after all these years?
JimBob2232 Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Cuing the stat that says the record for most linemen scoring in the playoff 3...2...1...
gobilz Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Setup for Tedy to win the game and keep the planets in line.
bills44 Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Brady did a poor job of disguising that screen
KD in CA Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Maguire said: Could this be . . . a lucky break for a Pats opponent? Have the football gods decided to shine light on the Colts after all these years? No. Just setting up the Indy fans for a heartbreaking finish. Bank on it.
Simon Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Quote If that were the rule, a catch deep in the end zone in which the receiver has to jump to grab the ball has little chance of succeeding since the DB can push him out of bounds while mid-airFine. If you can't catch it in bounds, why do you deserve a TD? Quote Could this be . . . a lucky break for a Pats opponent? Have the football gods decided to shine light on the Colts after all these years? My wife is currently trying to figure out what "Saturday broke the curse!" means.
Dawgg Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Makes "logical" sense to make it a black or white issue, but I feel that with such a rule, the net effect will essentially "reduce" the size of the end zone. Routes will be cut short to provide enough room to accommodate the scenario in which the ball is caught in the air. And what about sideline catches? Should a similar rule be in place there as well? Simon said: Fine. If you can't catch it in bounds, why do you deserve a TD?
JimBob2232 Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 Oh how I would love to see a Vinatieri FG win this game
bills44 Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 JimBob2232 said: Oh how I would love to see a Vinatieri FG win this game that would be rich.
billsfanmiami(oh) Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 JimBob2232 said: Oh how I would love to see a Vinatieri FG win this game How crazy would it be to see a Vinatieri missed field goal loose the game for the Colts as time expires?
bills44 Posted January 22, 2007 Posted January 22, 2007 hmm...looked to me like players from both teams were guilty of facemasks, but only one was called....
Recommended Posts