Alaska Darin Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 now it is Thanks Joe. I'd be totally lost without you.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 Thanks Joe. I'd be totally lost without you. Ya don't say.
BuffOrange Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 And the crusade continues to try to make yourself look like an expert on a message board. Sad. OK 'Rich Kotite of posting'.
Mikie2times Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 OK 'Rich Kotite of posting'. Your a pretender BuffOrange
MadBuffaloDisease Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 I would have challenged that Glenn caught that ball that he fumbled, since he trapped it on the ground and he lost it for a second.
Kelly the Dog Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 I would have challenged that Glenn caught that ball that he fumbled, since he trapped it on the ground and he lost it for a second. That was clearly a catch to me. If he went for a TD 99 yards do you think there was a chance in hell they would call it back?
Kelly the Dog Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 Definitely. Didn't they change the rule 2-3 years ago specifically to make those catches legal? I think he caught it, touched it to the ground while clearly in possession, and then ran.
Dwight Drane Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 is that Joe Ferguson wearing #9 for Dallas? I know....what a flamer. How can he be in any positive place for that last throw after the way he was pouting?
nodnarb Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 that wasn't a meltdown...teams losses are meltdowns. Parcells had that game won and Romo did the unthinkable after playing a solid game. That game, like many playoff games, serve as a reminder that nothing is automatic. I feel bad for Parcells, personally. I thought he coached a good game and Dallas was the better team.
Dwight Drane Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 At least they covered. Ditto....plus Seattle moves on, probably to Chicago. I really like Chicago and I figure money will be burned on anyone who plays them. I was a bit scared of Dallas, but I think the Bears take care of Seattle by 2 Tds+. What a finish!
MadBuffaloDisease Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 Didn't they change the rule 2-3 years ago specifically to make those catches legal? I think he caught it, touched it to the ground while clearly in possession, and then ran. It was actually back in 1999 and called the Bert Emanuel rule. But you have to control the ball. I'm positive I saw Glenn lose the ball when it hit the ground.
Kelly the Dog Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 It was actually back in 1999 and called the Bert Emanuel rule. But you have to control the ball. I'm positive I saw Glenn lose the ball when it hit the ground. He did but he was in possession of it first. And no one touched him before or after. So he caught it, fumbled it (by a half-inch), recovered it, started running, and then fumbled it again.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 To catch a ball, you have to control it and make a football move. He did neither.
Rico Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 Ditto....plus Seattle moves on, probably to Chicago. I really like Chicago and I figure money will be burned on anyone who plays them. I was a bit scared of Dallas, but I think the Bears take care of Seattle by 2 Tds+. What a finish! I haven't made my mind up yet on that game, cause Grossman does suck, but he may get a quick pull. My big money next week is on the Ravens... it's gonna be crazy all week here in Baltimore, and that stadium will be insane on Saturday. Here's to Ray Lewis putting a Mo Lewis on PGump.
Recommended Posts