dave mcbride Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 Given this, we should probably all be very happy that they managed to finish at 7-9. The Bills played all of the the league's top six teams (NE twice, Indy, Baltimore, SD, Chicago, Jets twice [Jets had same record as Philly and NO, but played a harder schedule]). Those eight games alone meant that we played teams with a combined record of 96-32 (76-20 if you don't include the Jets). That is an absolutely brutal schedule. Tennessee had the second hardest schedule (146-110).
Buffal0 Bill5 Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 2007 Isn't going to be much fun either http://www.nfl.com/schedules/tv/2007_opponents#schedule
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 2007 Isn't going to be much fun either http://www.nfl.com/schedules/tv/2007_opponents#schedule Here's one NBF might appreciate: To be the man, you've got to beat the man!
buffalobillsfootball Posted January 3, 2007 Posted January 3, 2007 Given this, we should probably all be very happy that they managed to finish at 7-9. The Bills played all of the the league's top six teams (NE twice, Indy, Baltimore, SD, Chicago, Jets twice [Jets had same record as Philly and NO, but played a harder schedule]). Those eight games alone meant that we played teams with a combined record of 96-32 (76-20 if you don't include the Jets). That is an absolutely brutal schedule. Tennessee had the second hardest schedule (146-110). Does someone have a link on this - I believe it - but my buddy (pats fan) here doesn't...
dave mcbride Posted January 3, 2007 Author Posted January 3, 2007 Does someone have a link on this - I believe it - but my buddy (pats fan) here doesn't... this one will do: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n.../s100927S58.DTL
Recommended Posts