Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 WTF? This assclown's been hating on the Bills during the entire second half of the season, and now he Predicts 27 points for a Tennessee team that registered something like 40 yard of offense the week prior? I'm calling bull sh--.
TheZone78 Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 I agree. Everybody knows that the Titans have only been winning on fluke plays right at the end of the game......probably shouldn't have said that.......
The Avenger Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 So in order to have a good Bills site you need to say the Bills will win every game? You're not ever allowed to think that perhaps the Bills don't matchup well againt the Titans and may (gasp!) give up more than 3 TDs? For that the site sucks? Look, everyone's entitled to their opinion, don't blast someone for it, especially someone who works hard to bring news and opinion to Bills fans. So what happens if the Bills DO give up 27 points on Sunday - do we get to say you suck and call you an assclown?
hoser12 Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 no doubt I can't understand it either Bills 27 homerun throwback scuzballs 13 dolphins 20 jets 13 patsies 21 jags 13 chiefs 24 raiders 10 broncos 24 bengals 21 sweeeeeeeeetttttt!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Bills
Chilly Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 WTF? This assclown's been hating on the Bills during the entire second half of the season, Link or it didn't happen. Seriously, they do a pretty god job of reviewing the team. They really hated against the Bills here. Here Here Here Here Here And Here The only one he's been too hard on the Bills on was the SD game I think. He has NOT been hating on the Bills. and now he Predicts 27 points for a Tennessee team that registered something like 40 yard of offense the week prior? 873377[/snapback] This preview? I understand why he's saying it - the Titans have a great run game, with a running QB, and that might throw the Bills for a loop. We haven't faced a team like that thus far this season. I don't necessarily agree, but he doesn't just post garbage to his website without having evidence to support it, like the first part of this post.
IDBillzFan Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 When I read that article I immediately got the distinct feeling that their prediction was based on the theory that our luck is about to run out.
jarthur31 Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 WTF? This assclown's been hating on the Bills during the entire second half of the season, and now he Predicts 27 points for a Tennessee team that registered something like 40 yard of offense the week prior? I'm calling bull sh--. 873377[/snapback] I think they had us beating Miami yet give Tenn more credit than they deserve. Titans are not better than the aforementioned. They have trouble scoring on offense much like we did earlier in the year.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 20, 2006 Author Posted December 20, 2006 I understand why he's saying it - the Titans have a great run game, with a running QB, and that might throw the Bills for a loop. We haven't faced a team like that thus far this season. 873396[/snapback] We haven't? What the HELL is Jacksonville then? I'll tell you what Jacksonville is. It's a team with a great running game, a running QB AND a good defense. Something Tennessee is not.
Bill from NYC Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 I want to say that Bills Daily is great. The guy gives us salary cap information 12 months a year. I couldn't give less of a f%^k who he thinks will win on Sunday.
Chilly Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 We haven't? What the HELL is Jacksonville then? I'll tell you what Jacksonville is. It's a team with a great running game, a running QB AND a good defense. 873409[/snapback] No, we haven't. Garrard is NOT a running QB.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 20, 2006 Author Posted December 20, 2006 No, we haven't. Garrard is NOT a running QB JSP. 873417[/snapback] O.o Research. he's got 224 yards on 40ish carries.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 When I read that article I immediately got the distinct feeling that their prediction was based on the theory that our luck is about to run out. "Our luck?" Look up "lucky" in the dictionary and the 2006 Titans' pictures are right next to it. Frankly what I think will happen is the Bills send the DE's upfield to/and play contain on Young, stack the LOS, and dare him to beat the Bills with the pass. And it's gonna be cold!
Alaska Darin Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 WTF? This assclown's been hating on the Bills during the entire second half of the season, and now he Predicts 27 points for a Tennessee team that registered something like 40 yard of offense the week prior? I'm calling bull sh--. 873377[/snapback] Yeah, they suck. I wonder if anyone over there publically wished for Ralph to die?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 20, 2006 Author Posted December 20, 2006 Yeah, they suck. I wonder if anyone over there publically wished for Ralph to die? 873431[/snapback] Your pithy point?
BUFFALOTONE Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 So in order to have a good Bills site you need to say the Bills will win every game? You're not ever allowed to think that perhaps the Bills don't matchup well againt the Titans and may (gasp!) give up more than 3 TDs? For that the site sucks? Look, everyone's entitled to their opinion, don't blast someone for it, especially someone who works hard to bring news and opinion to Bills fans. So what happens if the Bills DO give up 27 points on Sunday - do we get to say you suck and call you an assclown? 873390[/snapback] Yes we do.
Chilly Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 O.o Research. he's got 224 yards on 40ish carries. 873420[/snapback] And? McNabb had 212 yards before he was injured too, and he isn't a running QB. Gradkowski has 40ish carries, and he isn't a running QB either. Garrard isn't a running QB in the mold of Vick or Vince either. They are all QBs who have proven that they ahve the ability to scramble. Garrard doesn't have the running skills that Vick, Vince, or a true-running QB does.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 20, 2006 Author Posted December 20, 2006 And? McNabb had 212 yards before he was injured too, and he isn't a running QB. Gradkowski has 40ish carries, and he isn't a running QB either. Garrard isn't a running QB in the mold of Vick or Vince either. They are all QBs who have proven that they ahve the ability to scramble. Garrard doesn't have the running skills that Vick, Vince, or a true-running QB does. 873436[/snapback] LMAO... This is the first I have EVER heard anyone say McNabb is NOT a running QB.
Chilly Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 LMAO... This is the first I have EVER heard anyone say McNabb is NOT a running QB. 873441[/snapback] Really? Thats funny, cause McNabb over his career has been focusing more and more on staying in the pocket.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 20, 2006 Author Posted December 20, 2006 Really? Thats funny, cause McNabb over his career has been focusing more and more on staying in the pocket. 873443[/snapback] Now he is. Or was. But the first several seasons of his career, he ran. A lot.
Chilly Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 Now he is. Or was. But the first several seasons of his career, he ran. A lot. 873444[/snapback] Yeah, and? That isn't relevant to a discussion about how QBs are playing today.
Recommended Posts