WWVaBeach Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 USS Gerald Ford! Help fix this injustice: www.cvn78.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 I vote for the USS Patrick Buchannon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 USS Mark Miller.....Iraq is going down Gary...only the US is going to win...yyyyyyyeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 I vote for the USS Patrick Buchannon 873229[/snapback] That would be one of the three worst Aircraft Carriers in US history. Jim-MAY!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 It can tool around with the USS Jimmy Carter.. The big surprise is there isn't a USS Robert Byrd yet. It would have to be an Oiler, though.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 That would be one of the three worst Aircraft Carriers in US history. Jim-MAY!!!!!!!!!!!! 873242[/snapback] Pat is a hamster rights advocate, though....how can you say that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 USS Gerald Ford! Help fix this injustice: www.cvn78.com 873226[/snapback] Isn't the JFK retired already? If not, it should be retired by the time CVN78 is commissioned. What gets me is that, with the current vogue of naming carriers after presidents, they probably won't commission another Enterprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 USS Edward Kennedy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 "What gets me is that, with the current vogue of naming carriers after presidents..." 873260[/snapback] I've never cared for that, myself. I understand the 1st SecDef Forrestal being so honored, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 USS Edward Kennedy 873261[/snapback] That's what they temporarily renamed the USS Intrepid when it got stuck in the mud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 That's what they temporarily renamed the USS Intrepid when it got stuck in the mud. 873275[/snapback] Maybe a submarine would be more appropriate for Teddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajzepp Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 Maybe a submarine would be more appropriate for Teddy. 873278[/snapback] I concur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinandjokin Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 USS Beast of the Mid-East That should spur some solid international relations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 The USS Paris Hilton...submarine tender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 I've never cared for that, myself. I understand the 1st SecDef Forrestal being so honored, though. 873267[/snapback] And Nimitz. And even Reagan (I don't agree with it...but considering his 600-ship navy plan, I can understand it). But the USS George H.W. Bush? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 The USS Paris Hilton...submarine tender. 873306[/snapback] Better an amphibious transport, though. Lots of Marines in her... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 USS My Big 10 Inch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted December 20, 2006 Author Share Posted December 20, 2006 Isn't the JFK retired already? If not, it should be retired by the time CVN78 is commissioned. What gets me is that, with the current vogue of naming carriers after presidents, they probably won't commission another Enterprise. 873260[/snapback] The Enterprise is still in commission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted December 20, 2006 Share Posted December 20, 2006 The Enterprise is still in commission. 873314[/snapback] I know, but it's slated for decomissioning soon. And, as I said, I have low expectations of there being another... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted December 20, 2006 Author Share Posted December 20, 2006 I know, but it's slated for decomissioning soon. And, as I said, I have low expectations of there being another... 873316[/snapback] Right now she's slated for decomming in 2013. With the way these things slip to the right it could just as well be 2023. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts