Fingon Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Could he be? I don't know but lets see how he compares to other so called "star" offensive lineman Pace: 4.5 sacks allowed 8 games Matt Light: 5 sacks allowed 13 games Jonathan Ogden: 3.5 sacks allowed 13 games Walter Jones: 7.5 sacks allowed 13 games Flozell Adams: 6.5 sacks allowed 13 games Allan Faneca: 4.25 sacks allowed 13 games Jason Peters: 1 sack allowed 13 games
5 Wide Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Could he be? I don't know but lets see how he compares to other so called "star" offensive lineman Pace: 4.5 sacks allowed 8 games Matt Light: 5 sacks allowed 13 games Jonathan Ogden: 3.5 sacks allowed 13 games Walter Jones: 7.5 sacks allowed 13 games Flozell Adams: 6.5 sacks allowed 13 games Allan Faneca: 4.25 sacks allowed 13 games Jason Peters: 1 sack allowed 13 games 864023[/snapback] Well he does look rock solid, he just doesn't have the resume of the others yet......but it's coming
Dibs Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Jason Peters: 1 sack allowed 13 games 864023[/snapback] And if that sack was the one against SD......it was only a sack because JP ran into the tackler rather than away from....or back into the pocket. Peters did a perfect job.
bluv Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Could he be? I don't know but lets see how he compares to other so called "star" offensive lineman Pace: 4.5 sacks allowed 8 games Matt Light: 5 sacks allowed 13 games Jonathan Ogden: 3.5 sacks allowed 13 games Walter Jones: 7.5 sacks allowed 13 games Flozell Adams: 6.5 sacks allowed 13 games Allan Faneca: 4.25 sacks allowed 13 games Jason Peters: 1 sack allowed 13 games 864023[/snapback] I don't know about that for I have seen him give up at least 3 playing at both LT and RT. But if I am wrong and the only sack he is given credit for was the one against the Chargers where JP slipped and fell backwards into Merriman then definitely more power to Peters! Thank god we re-signed him cheap for the next 3 years. If he continues his play he should NO DOUBT be rewarded witha rich contract when it is time to re-new for he would have PROVED and EARNED a big payday unlike those high draft picks everbody seems to want us to select and make rich without earning it!
ajzepp Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 That's amazing....I agree with 5wide...the kid needs more experience, but it's looking more and more like that's ALL that separates him from some of the better tackles in the game....I still can't believe this has happened with him the way it has. Just amazing....
MattyT Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Don't tell him or we won't be able to afford him.
LevysEraII Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Jason Peters is da man, brother!!! Best LT in football, no doubt. Younger, faster and better than all of those other guys you listed. And cheaper!!!
5 Wide Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 And you left out the best part.......He grew up a huge Bills fan
JStranger76 Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Easy killers......... I'm as thrilled about his play at LT as any but he has played a total of what, 5 games at LT. Don't curse us with the best in football talk just yet. But hey, how does it feel going into the offseason without listing "trade up to get can't miss Robert Gallery type" as one of our needs? I'll tell ya how it feels, it feels pretty f****n good!!!!!!!!!!!!
MadBuffaloDisease Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Thank god we re-signed him cheap for the next 3 years. Try the next 5 years.
East Brady Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Solomon Wilcox basicly said the very same thing on sirius NFL yesterday, he was raving about the play of peters, and frankly I think he's right.......
duey Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 His motor is always running. Bit of a reach though.
Recommended Posts