Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
So who thinks that running back is still a primary need for this team, and we need to get rid of Willis? Judging by the way that the offense was running after Willis left, I'd say we're in trouble if we don't keep McGahee.

 

Looks like he took Marv's advice, and hopefully he'll be back in the 2nd half.

861852[/snapback]

We are in more trouble if we don't get more threats opposite Evans or at TE that can consistently get open. At least make this a stop Lee offense and move him around and make the defense adjust; that way the adjustments by the D will open up the run game or other passing targets.

  • Replies 350
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
RB is basically never any team's primary need, which is why I didn't like the WM pick in the first place.

861854[/snapback]

Especially when you had a good but not great RB but many other holes to be filled as we had in that draft but that is another topic...we have WM now so WM: SUCK IT UP AND GET BACK OUT THERE AND GASH THEM JETS!!!!!

Posted
JP eye balls Lee way too much.  He won't bother to look Price's way.

861856[/snapback]

Not fair; they just keep having close alls. And don't forget who caught the game winning TD against the Texans...

Posted
RB is basically never any team's primary need, which is why I didn't like the WM pick in the first place.

861854[/snapback]

Agreed---with the rare exception when you can get a wife beater or wifebeater/murderer with the pick.

Posted
These commentators need to get that Packers game out their mind...

861863[/snapback]

Every play they say something like they need to do what they did against Green Bay or last week they got 350 yds in the first half.

Posted
OK Ian Eagle "right at the marker" if you mean a full yard short.

861869[/snapback]

 

He vies for the most un-abashed homer on the CBS 'team'

Posted
Terrible job by the Jets - what is there a 2% chance of not picking up the 1st there?

861871[/snapback]

 

Now they'll talk up the genius of eric mangini some more how he tried to catch us offguard. :angry:

Posted
Now they'll talk up the genius of eric mangini some more how he tried to catch us offguard.  :angry:

861874[/snapback]

 

Especially given that Brady is a career 50-for-50 picking up the 1st against us on quick count QB sneaks 0:)

Posted
What was that.

861870[/snapback]

 

That was the Jests hoping our D would get antsy and flinch, by thinking it was all an act and it would be a direct snap to a RB, etc. It didn't work.

×
×
  • Create New...