seq004 Posted November 26, 2006 Posted November 26, 2006 I had to work so I didn't get to see what looks like a great game. I think this photo must have been taken after he had already dragged his feet in bounds. Did they review it? Go Bills!!!! My Webpage Pass to Roscoe
EC-Bills Posted November 26, 2006 Posted November 26, 2006 seq004 said: I had to work so I didn't get to see what looks like a great game. I think this photo must have been taken after he had already dragged his feet in bounds. Did they review it? Go Bills!!!! My Webpage Pass to Roscoe 848685[/snapback] Yep, he was in bounds and the ref reviewing it agreed.
seq004 Posted November 26, 2006 Author Posted November 26, 2006 Sorry if it's not coming threw. It was a photo on the NFL web page
Brandon Posted November 26, 2006 Posted November 26, 2006 They did review it, but none of the camera angles were definitive. The ref was standing almost right in front of it when it happened, so I can only guess that yes, he was in bounds.
Pirate Angel Posted November 26, 2006 Posted November 26, 2006 Im not sure how but he was, It was a great catch
Fezmid Posted November 26, 2006 Posted November 26, 2006 Brandon said: The ref was standing almost right in front of it when it happened Yup -and the ref looked very confident that it was a catch. No hesitation at all.
Simon Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 Fezmid said: Yup -and the ref looked very confident that it was a catch. No hesitation at all. 848708[/snapback] The other ref was resonsible for OB, that back judge only has responsibility for possession.
WVUFootball29 Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 Was at the game and the play happen almost right in front of me... it was a catch..not by much, but it was a catch and a big one.
mead107 Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 he was lookink right at his feet . then made the call right away
seq004 Posted November 27, 2006 Author Posted November 27, 2006 mead107 said: he was lookink right at his feet . then made the call right away 848868[/snapback] Thanks people.
RVJ Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 If you had to go by this picture he didn't. http://www.nfl.com/photos/football_2006_week_12/JAC@BUF Its clutch catch II.
rockpile Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 Buffal0 Bill5 said: It looked good on my radio 848842[/snapback] Mine too. I was surprised that they reviewed it.
Webster Guy Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 RVJ said: If you had to go by this picture he didn't.http://www.nfl.com/photos/football_2006_week_12/JAC@BUF Its clutch catch II. 848919[/snapback] Hopefully that picture is after he dragged his feet. I watched the game on TV and CBS has to be the worst sports network going. They had NO good angles of that particular catch (thankfully I think), didn't replay a few controversial calls, and had announcers who were just bad. CBS is just horrible, plain and simple.
ESPeculatioN Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 Webster Guy said: Hopefully that picture is after he dragged his feet. I watched the game on TV and CBS has to be the worst sports network going. They had NO good angles of that particular catch (thankfully I think), didn't replay a few controversial calls, and had announcers who were just bad. CBS is just horrible, plain and simple. 849115[/snapback] I'd disagree Fox is an all around horrible network in every way, CBS just didn't get a good angle.
jarthur31 Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 I don't know how anyone can stomach the middle schoolery that is the Fox NFL pregame show. LOL or post game show for that matter. James Brown was wise to leave for CBS. But I prefer the Countdown on ESPN.
Matt in KC Posted November 27, 2006 Posted November 27, 2006 The picture is tiny, but this is one of the highlights posted at NFL.com: http://www.nfl.com/video. You can tell he tapped his feet before the "clutch catch II" picture was taken. Man, that guy is zippy!
Recommended Posts