Swift Sylvan Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Justin Bannan was one too. 837442[/snapback] Good Point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJsackedagain Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Justin Bannan was one too. 837442[/snapback] Don't forget about John Parella Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 What would it cost us to get Aaron Brooks from the Raiders? He'd be an improvement over JP and allow us to focus on our real needs like WR, LB and OL in the draft. 837010[/snapback] That would be a great move..................ARE U SERIOUS? Brooks is awful. He's probably the worst qb in the league and his numbers over the past several year show it. I know the Bills won't go after him. Even I wuld have to admit that I would stick with Losman over Brooks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoondckCL Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Don't forget about John Parella 837455[/snapback] And my personal favorite....Jeff Wright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 That would be a great move..................ARE U SERIOUS? Brooks is awful. He's probably the worst qb in the league and his numbers over the past several year show it. I know the Bills won't go after him. Even I wuld have to admit that I would stick with Losman over Brooks. 837471[/snapback] Losman will not get it done. If you don't like Brooks even though he did well in New Orleans, what do you think of Brunell who may be available? I know he is old but we could get two more years out of him. His numbers are better than Losman's. The Patriots are a great team and they just signed Testeverde who is older than Brunell so don't laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Losman will not get it done. If you don't like Brooks even though he did well in New Orleans, what do you think of Brunell who may be available? I know he is old but we could get two more years out of him. His numbers are better than Losman's. The Patriots are a great team and they just signed Testeverde who is older than Brunell so don't laugh. 837602[/snapback] Well, if not Brooks, then I guess we should go after Vinny then, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 sh-- is getting deep around this place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinandjokin Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 wtf are you smokin? 837437[/snapback] Nope, he's crayonz. Not your best work here crayonz, you're better than this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 dozen Krispy Kreme..with the Hot light ON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5 Wide Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Nope, he's crayonz. Not your best work here crayonz, you're better than this... 837632[/snapback] He's just running up the score now. Taking the bait is brought to a whole new level sometimes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 Well, if not Brooks, then I guess we should go after Vinny then, huh? 837605[/snapback] Vinny is taken now. I don't like the idea of Geoff Jorge because he is not good in the locker room so all I can see until the draft is Brunell. We should do anything to get a good QB in the first round, including trading up. If we can get a good young QB in free agency then we should. I'm hoping the Broncos win the Super Bowl or do really terrible. If they win the Super Bowl with Plummer they will probably want to cut or trade Cutler. If they bomb out they wil go with Cutler and cut Plummer. That's a win win for us. Watch Denver closely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornerville Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 dozen Krispy Kreme..with the Hot light ON 837634[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 dozen Krispy Kreme..with the Hot light ON 837634[/snapback] The Bills get ripped off in that deal He isn't worth 1/2 a dozen, with the light OFF As for testeverde, not a Marv kind of move, he is bringing in younger player, not guys as old as him and Ralph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 crayonz, are you on glue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdubs Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Losman will not get it done. If you don't like Brooks even though he did well in New Orleans, what do you think of Brunell who may be available? I know he is old but we could get two more years out of him. His numbers are better than Losman's. The Patriots are a great team and they just signed Testeverde who is older than Brunell so don't laugh. 837602[/snapback] If he did so well in NO, why did they get rid of him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loadofmularkey Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Nope, he's crayonz. Not your best work here crayonz, you're better than this... 837632[/snapback] Having spent many wasted hours in the baseball forum last month, I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 If he did so well in NO, why did they get rid of him? 837889[/snapback] They didn't. End of contract and Oakland paid him a boatload of money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 They didn't. End of contract and Oakland paid him a boatload of money. 837898[/snapback] There was a reason why they did not re-sign him...He was benched for the last 3 games of the 2005 season in favor of Todd Bouman. Brooks signed a 2 year contract with the Oakland Raiders averaging about $4M per year....I wouldn't call that Boatload of money for a starter (though good money) QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthonyF Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Jeff George could also be available.... We need a character guy!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 That would be a great move..................ARE U SERIOUS? Brooks is awful. He's probably the worst qb in the league and his numbers over the past several year show it. I know the Bills won't go after him. Even I wuld have to admit that I would stick with Losman over Brooks. 837471[/snapback] But think of all the time you'd save wondering who to blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts