Jump to content

Down goes another GOP talking point


Recommended Posts

Number one, you're arguing semantics. Number 2, you're arguing about something that has nothing whatsoever to do with Ramius's level of competence (or lack thereof).

853961[/snapback]

Someone is getting pissy and talking about #1 and #2

 

Is this a guilty conscious trying to tell us that you were the one who made dookie in the urinal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 398
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Number one, you're arguing semantics. Number 2, you're arguing about something that has nothing whatsoever to do with Ramius's level of competence (or lack thereof).

853961[/snapback]

 

1) A die having a "true value" of 3.5 isn't a semantic argument. :D

2) Yeah, whatever. Where are your research publications?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...l=pubmed_docsum

 

Eat  :D  you worthless waste of a human being.

 

PS - i have 3 more on the way.

856201[/snapback]

 

But you obviously don't know anything about it. You measured the effects of CD4 and CD8 T-cells...but your T-cells obviously should have had a true value of CD6, so you used the wrong cells... :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! You found a group of people you can leach off of. Color me impressed.

857906[/snapback]

 

Yeah, because you know, people that are publishing research generally have no problem with other people not doing any work and taking credit for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, because you know, people that are publishing research generally have no problem with other people not doing any work and taking credit for it.

857917[/snapback]

 

Thats from my undergrad research. And i didnt, you know, write an undergrad thesis based on that research or anything.

 

I actually wrote roughly 1/3 of that paper. there 3 of us undergrads in the lab all working on different parts of the project, and all of us wrote stuff for the paper, with our boss having the final input, and thus 1st authorship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats from my undergrad research. And i didnt, you know, write an undergrad thesis based on that research or anything.

 

I actually wrote roughly 1/3 of that paper. there 3 of us undergrads in the lab all working on different parts of the project, and all of us wrote stuff for the paper, with our boss having the final input, and thus 1st authorship.

857969[/snapback]

I hope for the sake of the paper that the three of you (or at least you) provided the work, while your boss did all the real thinking. Because if you were in charge of the thinking, the paper would be worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you can judge his research as worthless because...?

858008[/snapback]

I wrote that if Ramius was in charge of the thinking (which he isn't) the paper would be worthless. I'm basing this on the assumption that good research requires good thinking, and the observation that Ramius is generally incapable of rigorous thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know this because...?

And you know this because...?

858013[/snapback]

I'll grant you your first "you know this because . . . ?" It's conceivable there's some field of research in which good work doesn't require good thinking. Maybe Ramius has manged to stumble across such a field.

 

As for your second question, I've seen Ramius in action long enough to get an idea of his capabilities and limitations. Unless he's a far different man in the real world than he is on these discussion boards, he isn't fit for serious intellectual work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll grant you your first "you know this because . . . ?" It's conceivable there's some field of research in which good work doesn't require good thinking. Maybe Ramius has manged to stumble across such a field.

 

But that doesn't actually answer the question? How do you know "good research" requires "good thinking"?

 

As for your second question, I've seen Ramius in action long enough to get an idea of his capabilities and limitations. Unless he's a far different man in the real world than he is on these discussion boards, he isn't fit for serious intellectual work.

858026[/snapback]

 

Really? :D And I ask again, where are your publications?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...