catchescannonballs Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Says it costed $300,000 all paid for by medifreeload. Yet he still owns his own house worth at least $100,000. Should the government be able to seize his house to pay for what we tax payers paid for? Its not fair the tax payers to be left with this bill
X. Benedict Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Says it costed $300,000 all paid for by medifreeload. Yet he still owns his own house worth at least $100,000. Should the government be able to seize his house to pay for what we tax payers paid for? Its not fair the tax payers to be left with this bill 836596[/snapback] You are missing the boat here, the Seagram's company should pay for the new liver.
catchescannonballs Posted November 14, 2006 Author Posted November 14, 2006 You are missing the boat here, the Seagram's company should pay for the new liver. 836604[/snapback] they forced him to drink?
EC-Bills Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 they forced him to drink? 836625[/snapback] Yes they did. They showed him a commercial and he couldn't help himself after that. He's victim in the truest sense of the word.
X. Benedict Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Yes they did. They showed him a commercial and he couldn't help himself after that. He's victim in the truest sense of the word. 836628[/snapback] Those bastards.
catchescannonballs Posted November 14, 2006 Author Posted November 14, 2006 Yes they did. They showed him a commercial and he couldn't help himself after that. He's victim in the truest sense of the word. 836628[/snapback] actually the tax payers are the true victim. i bet that guy is out drinking again on his second liver
Bungee Jumper Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Says it costed $300,000 all paid for by medifreeload. Yet he still owns his own house worth at least $100,000. Should the government be able to seize his house to pay for what we tax payers paid for? Its not fair the tax payers to be left with this bill 836596[/snapback] Well...drunks do get more use out of their livers than most people. It's only fair. Better him than some teatotaler who's never had a drink in their life.
EC-Bills Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Those bastards. 836632[/snapback] Evil right wing bastards to be correct. They set this poor man up just so they could make a cheap buck and attack medicaid. This man was unfotunately a pawn in their sick sick game
X. Benedict Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Evil right wing bastards to be correct. They set this poor man up just so they could make a cheap buck and attack medicaid. This man was unfotunately a pawn in their sick sick game 836645[/snapback] In fairness, I haven't really decided on this one, the liquor taxes that this fellow has paid over a lifetime might have paved the roads that the ambulances have used to save someone I love, maybe. Until this fellow needed a liver, he was an American hero. Giving his tax money above and beyond the call.
EC-Bills Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 In fairness, I haven't really decided on this one, the liquor taxes that this fellow has paid over a lifetime might have paved the roads that the ambulances have used to save someone I love, maybe. Until this fellow needed a liver, he was an American hero. Giving his tax money above and beyond the call. 836652[/snapback] Oh you're so right. I was so wrapped up in my evil corporate bastards mode, that I completely neglected to look at the humanitarian aspect of this case. I feel less bitter now. Thank you for giving me a fresh perspective.
Johnny Coli Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I'm calling BS. They almost never give a new liver to someone who lost theirs via alcoholism. The list of otherwise-healthy recipients is far too long.
erynthered Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I'm calling BS. They almost never give a new liver to someone who lost theirs via alcoholism. The list of otherwise-healthy recipients is far too long. 836663[/snapback] I agree. But there's always the Mickey Mantle rule.
X. Benedict Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I'm calling BS. They almost never give a new liver to someone who lost theirs via alcoholism. The list of otherwise-healthy recipients is far too long. 836663[/snapback] Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving, And revolving at nine hundred miles an hour.....
Johnny Coli Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving,And revolving at nine hundred miles an hour..... 836671[/snapback] My world's got two speeds...33 and 1/3, and 45.
Bungee Jumper Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I'm calling BS.836663[/snapback] No sh--. Ya think?
catchescannonballs Posted November 14, 2006 Author Posted November 14, 2006 I'm calling BS. They almost never give a new liver to someone who lost theirs via alcoholism. The list of otherwise-healthy recipients is far too long. 836663[/snapback] It's 100% true. And think about it, how many non-drinkrers lose there liver? Most everyone who gets a transplant is a drunk
X. Benedict Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 My world's got two speeds...33 and 1/3, and 45. 836676[/snapback] What no 78? My world goes to 78. Makes everyone sound like Alvin and Theodore.
Bungee Jumper Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 It's 100% true.836685[/snapback] That would be a first for you.
EC-Bills Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 It's 100% true. And think about it, how many non-drinkrers lose there liver? Most everyone who gets a transplant is a drunk 836685[/snapback] And what source are you pulling this "information" from? A house worth $100K is really not worth that much. So how do you know this person actually did not have the money? Are you a doctor? There can be multitude of legitimate reasons a non drunk can loose their liver. As said before, the chances of a drunk getting a new liver are minimal at best.
Bungee Jumper Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 And what source are you pulling this "information" from? A house worth $100K is really not worth that much. So how do you know this person actually did not have the money? Are you a doctor? There can be multitude of legitimate reasons a non drunk can loose their liver. As said before, the chances of a drunk getting a new liver are minimal at best. 836699[/snapback] He knows. He's trolling. Why even bother?
Recommended Posts