ACor58 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 In a game that Buffalo LED 3-0, gave up 3 goals to allow the score to be tied, then scored the next 4 to put it away, how can he say that the Canes let one slip away. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/hock...s.ap/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Not to mention that the game never should have been tied. That first goal the Canes got was clearly goaltender interference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Sabres just overwhelmed them. There was no slipping to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 The Sabres let SEVERAL games against Carolina slip-away in the playoffs last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Not to mention that the game never should have been tied. That first goal the Canes got was clearly goaltender interference. 836423[/snapback] Bull. That goal was as legit as any the Sabres scored. Kalinin rode Williams into the crease. You want to blame anyone for that goal, it's on Biron. He simply needed to reach out and grab it since he was between the passer and the guy crashing the net. Typical softy (along with Rod Brindamonkey's) by Marty that is the reason he's not a starter and we can't actually move him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Bull. That goal was as legit as any the Sabres scored. Kalinin rode Williams into the crease. You want to blame anyone for that goal, it's on Biron. He simply needed to reach out and grab it since he was between the passer and the guy crashing the net. Typical softy (along with Rod Brindamonkey's) by Marty that is the reason he's not a starter and we can't actually move him. 836433[/snapback] I was at the game and didn't have the benefit of seeing a replay. It happened right in front of me though and as soon as it happened it looked like clear cut interference to me. I'll check the TiVo when I get home today. I know the Carolina play by play man thought it was interference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I was at the game and didn't have the benefit of seeing a replay. It happened right in front of me though and as soon as it happened it looked like clear cut interference to me. I'll check the TiVo when I get home today. I know the Carolina play by play man thought it was interference. 836435[/snapback] I thought it was clear-cut interference, too...until I saw the replay five more times. Then it wasn't as clear. Like Darin said, Williams was arguably pushed. Regardless, the officiating of that game was...unpleasant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 The way Lorentz went on about that play made me think he should have his dummy back. Peter Laviolette as someone shrewdly pointed out in last seasons playoffs, looks like a punk that would do your wife! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts