JayFromDC Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 IS just not the answer. Anytime you have to devise a game plan in which your QB doesn't even throw for 90 yards that means you pretty much don't believe in him. And if you don't believe in him hell, let's go with the 3rd stringer and see what he could do, JP losman reminds me alot of Kyle Boller in Baltimore, rocket arm but can't read defenses, pocket awareness is terrible and is turnover prone.
Nanker Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 IS just no the answer. Anytime you have to devise a game plan in which your QB doesn't even throw for 90 yards that means you pretty much don't believe in him. And if you don't believe in him hell, let's go with the 3rd stringer and see what he could do, JP losman reminds me alot of Kyle Boller in Baltimore, rocket arm but can't read defenses, pocket awareness is terrible and is turnover prone. 836368[/snapback] IS just no the answer? Of course not. I think it's the question.
AnthonyF Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 IS just no the answer. Anytime you have to devise a game plan in which your QB doesn't even throw for 90 yards that means you pretty much don't believe in him. And if you don't believe in him hell, let's go with the 3rd stringer and see what he could do, JP losman reminds me alot of Kyle Boller in Baltimore, rocket arm but can't read defenses, pocket awareness is terrible and is turnover prone. 836368[/snapback] Please tell me how terrible he is in the turnover game he is again??? Three games Chicago (3 ints), Detroit (1 int, 1 fumble) & NE (1 Int, 2 fumbles).... He very well may not be the answer, but let me see... Give me a 15-40 game or two so I can agree with all you naysayers and be happy to boot him out.
JayFromDC Posted November 14, 2006 Author Posted November 14, 2006 I mean I really would like to see what the 3rd String guy could do
Nanker Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I mean I really would like to see what the 3rd String guy could do 836374[/snapback] Then go watch practice.
AnthonyF Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I mean I really would like to see what the 3rd String guy could do 836374[/snapback] I too would like to see if he could complete 9 of his 13 passes the offence calls.
JayFromDC Posted November 14, 2006 Author Posted November 14, 2006 I mean hell if the Redskins finally woke up and realized that Mark Brunell had to sit his ass down, I think it's about time for us to do the same, we seem to be the only team that will just sit there and do nothing about our QB situation until people literally lose their jobs man
I 90 Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 IS just not the answer. Anytime you have to devise a game plan in which your QB doesn't even throw for 90 yards that means you pretty much don't believe in him. And if you don't believe in him hell, let's go with the 3rd stringer 836368[/snapback] J. P. is a good soldier who can hand the ball to Anthony Thomas 28 times a game. Your third stringer might be able to do the same thing. We will find out if two guys get hurt. It is not a question of belief. .
MadBuffaloDisease Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I mean hell if the Redskins finally woke up and realized that Mark Brunell had to sit his ass down, I think it's about time for us to do the same, we seem to be the only team that will just sit there and do nothing about our QB situation until people literally lose their jobs man The difference is Brunell is on the downside of his career and isn't the future. Campbell COULD be the future. Nall hasn't shown enough to be the 2nd string QB, much less a starter.
JayFromDC Posted November 14, 2006 Author Posted November 14, 2006 I understand the difference in the direction of the careers but at the same time, not getting it done is not getting it done, ie Brett Favre is arguably on the downside but is still producing so he keeps his job
pBills Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Forgive Jay from DC. We both live in an area where people have been calling for a change in the QB position for a LONG time. I believe it's simple. They drafted a ton of defensive players last year... this year it better be o-lineman, WRs and of course they have to land the biggest, badest, best free agent o-lineman. JP, like all QB's needs protection. And not the protection from whatever he could catch on Chippewa Street.
PacificCoastBillsFan Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Then go watch practice. 836375[/snapback] LMAO
tennesseeboy Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I guess it is time to risk the season and throw JP into overdrive. He can use his scrambling skills and what experience has gained so far to show what he can do from here on out. I am still hopeful he is good, but at this stage there is only one way to find out. I say unleash him for the rest of the season and if he doesn't cut it we can go in another direction. I hate thinking like this...but if he doesn't cut it our draft selection should get considerably better.
pBills Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I mean hell if the Redskins finally woke up and realized that Mark Brunell had to sit his ass down, I think it's about time for us to do the same, we seem to be the only team that will just sit there and do nothing about our QB situation until people literally lose their jobs man 836379[/snapback] What are you talking about? The Redskins aren't making this move because of bad play by Brunell, they are doing it for their investment. The problem with the Skins has been their Defense. And in regards to the Bills. JP is really a half year behind because of all of the crap that happened last year. He needs the year. And if they followed your idea, who would they bring in? Nall a guy who has what? 1 maybe 2 starts? Or Holcomb who we all know is not the answer?
pBills Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 tennesseeboy has it right. Enough with the cradling of JP, let him play. They obviously told him to sit still and not scramble, and they are limiting the pass calls. Let him loose a bit.
mike1011 Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 The difference is Brunell is on the downside of his career and isn't the future. Campbell COULD be the future. Nall hasn't shown enough to be the 2nd string QB, much less a starter. 836398[/snapback] Brunell was playing better than Losman this year.
Bungee Jumper Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Brunell was playing better than Losman this year. 836548[/snapback] On a completely different team. Jesus, you people are stupid.
I 90 Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I say unleash him for the rest of the season and if he doesn't cut it we can go in another direction. I hate thinking like this...but if he doesn't cut it our draft selection should get considerably better. 836491[/snapback] tennesseeboy has it right. 836515[/snapback] There will be no unleashing. He is executing the game plan (except for the one or two crucial plays that determine victory). There is no other direction. Yes, I am tiresome.
zow2 Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Green Bay, Indy and now Houston coming up. Three ho-hum defenses in the NFL. Let's see what JP and the offense can do vs. Houston. If he still can't produce points in the red zone then i hope he can get good value for his North Buffalo home because he will be working in another city next season. Look for Mario Williams to have his breakout day against our O-line and deer in the headlights QB.
SilverNRed Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 On a completely different team. Jesus, you people are stupid. 836550[/snapback]
Recommended Posts