catchescannonballs Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Our game plan seems to be not to let Losman lose the game for us. Wouldn't it be nice to have a quarterback that can make plays? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Our game plan seems to be not to let Losman lose the game for us. Wouldn't it be nice to have a quarterback that can make plays? 835034[/snapback] Here's an Idea! Let's block Dwight Freeney with Robert Royal. Oh, wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Wouldn't it be nice to have a line that would let our quarterback make plays? Geez..week after week its the same !@#$ing thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluv Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 There has to be something wrong with the blocking scheme we employ. Every game there seems to be a defender running unblocked at JP at some point. Since we have made this shuffle it has gotten 10 times worse so that now he doesn't even have the chance to setup. It's one thing to have a TE chip a DE but another to have him blocking one. CV got hurt later in the game and let's hope it last another week and that Reyes is healthy. Then maybe we can plug him in and he can be an upgrade over CV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catchescannonballs Posted November 13, 2006 Author Share Posted November 13, 2006 There has to be something wrong with the blocking scheme we employ. Every game there seems to be a defender running unblocked at JP at some point. Since we have made this shuffle it has gotten 10 times worse so that now he doesn't even have the chance to setup. It's one thing to have a TE chip a DE but another to have him blocking one. CV got hurt later in the game and let's hope it last another week and that Reyes is healthy. Then maybe we can plug him in and he can be an upgrade over CV. 835043[/snapback] If someone is coming unblocked it generally means someone should be open for a quick pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluv Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If someone is coming unblocked it generally means someone should be open for a quick pass. 835046[/snapback] And it would help if the coaching staff realized that as well and called more such plays. JP doesn't call the plays or even audibles. He just call the plays given to him. And it's one thing to have a LB or DB come in unblocked but another when a D-linemane is unblocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If someone is coming unblocked it generally means someone should be open for a quick pass. 835046[/snapback] yeah...in this case it was the tight end who whiffed on his block and was standing there with his head up his ass as the qb was sacked. I don't think passing to him would have done much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Coli Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 yeah...in this case it was the tight end who whiffed on his block and was standing there with his head up his ass as the qb was sacked. I don't think passing to him would have done much. 835064[/snapback] He would have dropped it anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catchescannonballs Posted November 13, 2006 Author Share Posted November 13, 2006 yeah...in this case it was the tight end who whiffed on his block and was standing there with his head up his ass as the qb was sacked. I don't think passing to him would have done much. 835064[/snapback] Wouldn't hurt if Losman could get rid of the ball before he gets sacked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 He would have dropped it anyway. 835080[/snapback] Its funny cause its true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If someone is coming unblocked it generally means someone should be open for a quick pass. 835046[/snapback] When people say, "someone is coming in unblocked" they're not talking about a blitz where there are more rushers than blockers. They're talking about the DE or DT lined up right in front of an OL who just runs right by the man who is supposed to block him. I'd imagine if you watched the games you'd know this and not assume it was a blitz. I don't remember the Colts blitzing much, if at all, yesterday. Why blitz when you can get contstant pressure without doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If someone is coming unblocked it generally means someone should be open for a quick pass. 835046[/snapback] Peerless Price....Unfortunately finding him is as easy as tracking down the Mole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Wouldn't hurt if Losman could get rid of the ball before he gets sacked 835096[/snapback] Now that is funny. Losman loves the ball so much that he refused to part with it. He would rather take a sack rather than have a incompletion. After all it helps boost his completion percentage....Something that probably Rob Johnson told him over the phone.....please....The guy does not have a chance to even lift his arm to throw the ball before the 350lb DT is on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If you want a perfect example of the clusterf**k our O-line has become, go back to the 2nd quarter yesterday. Mike Gandy is blocking his man when he sees Dwight Freeney go wide. The TE picks up Freeney but Gandy doesn't know that. Instead he stops blocking and turns to his right to see what was going on. At that moment, the guy Gandy was blocking runs right past him untouched and sacks Losman. I'm not saying JP Losman is the answer, but pick any QB in the NFL and put him behind our O-line and the rsults will be exactly the same. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 At that moment, the guy Gandy was blocking runs right past him untouched and sacks Losman. I'm not saying JP Losman is the answer, but pick any QB in the NFL and put him behind our O-line and the rsults will be exactly the same. PTR 835221[/snapback] I wish Mike Gandy is cut today for just that single play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5 Wide Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If someone is coming unblocked it generally means someone should be open for a quick pass. 835046[/snapback] Not unless Booger McFarland plays CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East Brady Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 When people say, "someone is coming in unblocked" they're not talking about a blitz where there are more rushers than blockers. They're talking about the DE or DT lined up right in front of an OL who just runs right by the man who is supposed to block him. I'd imagine if you watched the games you'd know this and not assume it was a blitz. I don't remember the Colts blitzing much, if at all, yesterday. Why blitz when you can get contstant pressure without doing so. 835195[/snapback] Why would Indy blitz when they know that covering the bills will surely result in a sack 2-3 seconds from the time the ball is snapped.....They blitzed alright .......run blitz......there is no need to blitz against this off. line because the recievers cannot find a seam to get open....peerless price was a waste of good money...........Hey, don't bother pointing out the obvious to people on this board when they think that guys coming unblocked ( DE-DT) should mean that a reciever will be open. I'm not sure what game they were watching......JP connects on a regular basis when he has time, which isn't very often........ Reality...........the bills were 2 plays from beating the colts on the road and the same people bitching today predicted a 50 point blowout ..go figure???? I'm not sure where the 2 plays could have come from...It would be nice to see this line make one so that the qb could make one, and maybe one from the kicker......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stenbar Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Now that is funny. Losman loves the ball so much that he refused to part with it. He would rather take a sack rather than have a incompletion. After all it helps boost his completion percentage....Something that probably Rob Johnson told him over the phone.....please....The guy does not have a chance to even lift his arm to throw the ball before the 350lb DT is on him. 835218[/snapback] He had plenty of time to throw another long bomb 2 yards out of bounds.He had plenty of time to throw 5 yards wide to Peerless on third and 10. The excuses are old. The bottom line for Losman is, if he had something to good to show we would have ssen it by now. He has done nothing positive that we can hang our hat on and say..there it is that is why we have been playing him and suffering for 2 yrs. He continues to make the same throwing errors, shows absolutely zero pocket presence or awareness and so far has demonstrated not any leadership on the field that I have seen. He just doesnt get it. I doubt he ever will. Regardless of the oline I do not foresee JP ever making it as QB of the Buffalo Bills. Time to move on.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Why would Indy blitz when they know that covering the bills will surely result in a sack 2-3 seconds from the time the ball is snapped.....They blitzed alright .......run blitz......there is no need to blitz against this off. line because the recievers cannot find a seam to get open....peerless price was a waste of good money...........Hey, don't bother pointing out the obvious to people on this board when they think that guys coming unblocked ( DE-DT) should mean that a reciever will be open. I'm not sure what game they were watching......JP connects on a regular basis when he has time, which isn't very often........ Reality...........the bills were 2 plays from beating the colts on the road and the same people bitching today predicted a 50 point blowout ..go figure???? I'm not sure where the 2 plays could have come from...It would be nice to see this line make one so that the qb could make one, and maybe one from the kicker......... 835232[/snapback] Exactly. Why blitz when the five-man OL gets CONSISTENTLY beat by a four-man rush? There's a reason receivers are never open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If someone is coming unblocked it generally means someone should be open for a quick pass. 835046[/snapback] Your right, Gandy is always left open for the pass, why doesn't JP throw it to him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts