MattyT Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 God, I feel dumber having read and responded to this. 828437[/snapback] That's what you get for replying to catchesbuchanansballsinhismouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Second Amendment. Use it or lose them. 828495[/snapback] oh yeah...those arms i DO have! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Half-serious. Like I said, I half-expect it. And Coli...I don't buy that, not completely. The Democrats are still pissed over that bull sh-- impeachment of Clinton...and rightfully so...and politics on The Hill is less rational than it is on the playground... Sure, Pelosi says that...but if Congress could impeach Clinton over a blow job from a fat broad, anything can happen... 828486[/snapback] not that it matters but was Clinton impeached for a blowjob or lying under oath? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 not that it matters but was Clinton impeached for a blowjob or lying under oath? 828569[/snapback] For lying about a blow job, under oath, in response to a question that had precisely nothing to do with the investigation anyway. I have yet to hear anyone explain how Starr's task of investigating Whitewater included Clinton's sexual escapades... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Half-serious. Like I said, I half-expect it. And Coli...I don't buy that, not completely. The Democrats are still pissed over that bull sh-- impeachment of Clinton...and rightfully so...and politics on The Hill is less rational than it is on the playground... Sure, Pelosi says that...but if Congress could impeach Clinton over a blow job from a fat broad, anything can happen... 828486[/snapback] Impeachment would be death politically for 2008, I think even the Dems realize this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 For lying about a blow job, under oath, in response to a question that had precisely nothing to do with the investigation anyway. I have yet to hear anyone explain how Starr's task of investigating Whitewater included Clinton's sexual escapades... 828578[/snapback] You liberal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 For lying about a blow job, under oath, in response to a question that had precisely nothing to do with the investigation anyway. I have yet to hear anyone explain how Starr's task of investigating Whitewater included Clinton's sexual escapades... 828578[/snapback] What if that deal was called Whitegoo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 For lying about a blow job, under oath, in response to a question that had precisely nothing to do with the investigation anyway. I have yet to hear anyone explain how Starr's task of investigating Whitewater included Clinton's sexual escapades... 828578[/snapback] As chris rock rock says... "He lied about a blowjob so his wife wouldnt find out. Whats so wrong with that. Is that against the law? sh--, i bet theres a couple hundred guys in this room that have done that. Just because he's president means he cant get some action on the side?" Chris then goes on to blame hilary, saying if she was doing her job as a wife, Bill wouldnt have had ot go elsewhere for a blowjob. I find that part hilarious. The girlfriend doesnt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 not that it matters but was Clinton impeached for a blowjob or lying under oath? 828569[/snapback] Point taken. Actually, I'm pretty sure he was impeached for lying under oath - about a blowjob! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Half-serious. Like I said, I half-expect it. And Coli...I don't buy that, not completely. The Democrats are still pissed over that bull sh-- impeachment of Clinton...and rightfully so...and politics on The Hill is less rational than it is on the playground... Sure, Pelosi says that...but if Congress could impeach Clinton over a blow job from a fat broad, anything can happen... 828486[/snapback] Sure, anything's possible, but impeachment is highly unlikely since there's no evidence of a crime and absolutely no chance for the subsequent 2/3 vote in the Senate that would be required to remove 'W' from office. With only 2 years left in GW's presidency anyway, the time, energy, and political cost would be too high for Pelosi and her party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Point taken. Actually, I'm pretty sure he was impeached for lying under oath - about a blowjob! 828629[/snapback] I know people are pretty dismissive of that sort of thing, but doesn't crap like that go hand in hand with blackmail - not that every single person in DC isn't bought and paid for anyway... just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted November 7, 2006 Author Share Posted November 7, 2006 not that every single person in DC isn't bought and paid for anyway... just saying. 828641[/snapback] So true . . . on both sides of the aisle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Sure, anything's possible, but impeachment is highly unlikely since there's no evidence of a crime and absolutely no chance for the subsequent 2/3 vote in the Senate that would be required to remove 'W' from office. With only 2 years left in GW's presidency anyway, the time, energy, and political cost would be too high for Pelosi and her party. 828639[/snapback] Ignoring the fringe freaks that think Cheney is behind 9/11, there's still plenty of not unreasonable people who think there's evidence for a crime just concerning Iraq or Katrina. That there isn't...well, when's the last time facts got in the way of good political ranting? Although they wouldn't get the 2/3 majority, you're right...but still, I contend that if they can impeach Clinton over a blow job, anything's possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted November 7, 2006 Share Posted November 7, 2006 Point taken. Actually, I'm pretty sure he was impeached for lying under oath - about a blowjob! 828629[/snapback] How about lying under oath just before: I swear to God I'll marry you if you do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 How about lying under oath just before: I swear to God I'll marry you if you do this. 828749[/snapback] Good one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted November 8, 2006 Share Posted November 8, 2006 As chris rock rock says... "He lied about a blowjob so his wife wouldnt find out. Whats so wrong with that. Is that against the law? sh--, i bet theres a couple hundred guys in this room that have done that. Just because he's president means he cant get some action on the side?" Chris then goes on to blame hilary, saying if she was doing her job as a wife, Bill wouldnt have had ot go elsewhere for a blowjob. I find that part hilarious. The girlfriend doesnt. 828628[/snapback] Yeah, women just don't comedy like guys do. I was laughung my a** off when I watching that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts