Peter Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 After some consideration, I think that the best thing that could happen for Republicans going into the 2008 presidential election would be for the Democrats to take control of the House. As it stands now, the Republicans control all three branches of government. If the Dems take control of the house, it will be easier to remind the voters what Democrats are like when they govern. Of course, this will depend on whether a traditional Republican gets the nomination and can distance himself from Iraq. Interestingly, the administration has tried to do all it can do to focus the electorate on these traditional Republican issues in this election cycle -- realizing that if the election is about Iraq, it is not a winning issue. The problem is that this administration forgot what the traditional conservative agenda is. There is an interesting piece in the American Conservative magazine that you may want to read. American Conservative Magazine: Just say "no" to Bush
OnTheRocks Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 After some consideration, I think that the best thing that could happen for Republicans going into the 2008 presidential election would be for the Democrats to take control of the House. As it stands now, the Republicans control all three branches of government. If the Dems take control of the house, it will be easier to remind the voters what Democrats are like when they govern. Of course, this will depend on whether a traditional Republican gets the nomination and can distance himself from Iraq. Interestingly, the administration has tried to do all it can do to focus the electorate on these traditional Republican issues in this election cycle -- realizing that if the election is about Iraq, it is not a winning issue. The problem is that this administration forgot what the traditional conservative agenda is. There is an interesting piece in the American Conservative magazine that you may want to read. American Conservative Magazine: Just say "no" to Bush 828377[/snapback] good article. thanks for the link.
Chilly Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 The House won't do much honestly. This 2-year cycle will be shown by the media as gridlock government at its worst, with the House refusing to get along with the Senate, congress with the whitehouse, and Democrats vs Republicans. The best thing for Republicans is to have the incumbency advantage for the next election cycles.
John Adams Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Republicans will retain power in the House.
The Senator Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 After some consideration, I think that the best thing that could happen for Republicans going into the 2008 presidential election would be for the Democrats to take control of the House. As it stands now, the Republicans control all three branches of government. If the Dems take control of the house, it will be easier to remind the voters what Democrats are like when they govern. Of course, this will depend on whether a traditional Republican gets the nomination and can distance himself from Iraq. Interestingly, the administration has tried to do all it can do to focus the electorate on these traditional Republican issues in this election cycle -- realizing that if the election is about Iraq, it is not a winning issue. The problem is that this administration forgot what the traditional conservative agenda is. There is an interesting piece in the American Conservative magazine that you may want to read. American Conservative Magazine: Just say "no" to Bush 828377[/snapback] I suspect that 2 years of Nancy Pelosi as Speaker will quell any and all hopes or desires for Hillary in '08.
catchescannonballs Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Republicans will retain power in the House. 828393[/snapback] I hope so for America's sake. Nancy Pelosi and here San Francisco values are dangerous to America. I f the Dims get there commie hands on the government it will take a jackhammer to get their incumbent asses out of power. Sad, too sad to think about at this point
OnTheRocks Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Republicans will retain power in the House. 828393[/snapback] really? Do you mean they will retain majority leadership or retain power? The reason I ask is I don't think the two go hand in hand.
erynthered Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 really?Do you mean they will retain majority leadership or retain power? The reason I ask is I don't think the two go hand in hand. 828401[/snapback] ( its really soprano, and he has really deep inside sources, leave him alone. He's on a roll...)
Chilly Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 ( he has really deep inside sources... 828409[/snapback] Wonder if they've turned him into goatse yet.
SDS Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 here's the guy you want to listen to on the numbers: http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2...generic_ba.html
Chilly Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 here's the guy you want to listen to on the numbers: http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2...generic_ba.html 828415[/snapback] RCP, while decidedly right wing, is an excellent source of political coverage and news.
Bungee Jumper Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 I suspect that 2 years of Nancy Pelosi as Speaker will quell any and all hopes or desires for Hillary in '08. 828397[/snapback] If she ends up Speaker, I half expect a big push to impeach Bush and Cheney and get Pelosi in the White House...
RuntheDamnBall Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 I hope so for America's sake. Nancy Pelosi and here San Francisco values are dangerous to America. I f the Dims get there commie hands on the government it will take a jackhammer to get their incumbent asses out of power. Sad, too sad to think about at this point 828400[/snapback] Does the electricity go out in your house when you try to construct a thought, or even a sentence in English? If the "Dims" are really as dim as your superior intellect seems to gauge, they should have no problem getting kicked out. God, I feel dumber having read and responded to this.
OnTheRocks Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 If she ends up Speaker, I half expect a big push to impeach Bush and Cheney and get Pelosi in the White House... 828423[/snapback] are you serious? i have heard this a couple of times in the past couple of weeks but i just can't see this ever happening. i can see Congress pushing for Impeachment hearings and making quite a bit of noise about it, but i just can't see it going anywhere. i think the new members of Congress that ran on a "Moderate" platform would be in a load of stevestojan with their voters if they went along with the "cronie dem leadership" on that.
Johnny Coli Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 are you serious?i have heard this a couple of times in the past couple of weeks but i just can't see this ever happening. i can see Congress pushing for Impeachment hearings and making quite a bit of noise about it, but i just can't see it going anywhere. i think the new members of Congress that ran on a "Moderate" platform would be in a load of stevestojan with their voters if they went along with the "cronie dem leadership" on that. 828455[/snapback] She's already gone on record that it's not gonna happen. Pelosi: 'Impeachment is off the table' (via Market Watch, 10/22) U.S. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has pledged not to pursue impeachment of President George W. Bush if Democrats win the November election. "Impeachment is off the table," said Pelosi in an interview aired Sunday on CBS "60 Minutes." Asked if that was a pledge, Pelosi said it was. "Yes, it is a pledge," she said. "Of course it is." Pelosi called impeachment "a waste of time," and suggested Republicans -- who have controlled the House for 12 years -- would make political hay out of it if Democrats tried to impeach Bush.
SDS Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 RCP, while decidedly right wing, is an excellent source of political coverage and news. 828416[/snapback] RCP aside, Jay Cost is the man... No one did it better in 2004.
OnTheRocks Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 She's already gone on record that it's not gonna happen.Pelosi: 'Impeachment is off the table' (via Market Watch, 10/22) 828466[/snapback] with all due respect, i don't trust her any further than i could throw her. (and i don't have any arms.)
RuntheDamnBall Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 with all due respect, i don't trust her any further than i could throw her. (and i don't have any arms.) 828473[/snapback] Even if you don't, she is dead right that it would be counter-productive and used against the Dems. I just don't see it happening.
Bungee Jumper Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 are you serious?i have heard this a couple of times in the past couple of weeks but i just can't see this ever happening. i can see Congress pushing for Impeachment hearings and making quite a bit of noise about it, but i just can't see it going anywhere. i think the new members of Congress that ran on a "Moderate" platform would be in a load of stevestojan with their voters if they went along with the "cronie dem leadership" on that. 828455[/snapback] Half-serious. Like I said, I half-expect it. And Coli...I don't buy that, not completely. The Democrats are still pissed over that bull sh-- impeachment of Clinton...and rightfully so...and politics on The Hill is less rational than it is on the playground... Sure, Pelosi says that...but if Congress could impeach Clinton over a blow job from a fat broad, anything can happen...
X. Benedict Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 with all due respect, i don't trust her any further than i could throw her. (and i don't have any arms.) 828473[/snapback] Second Amendment. Use it or lose them.
Recommended Posts