MadBuffaloDisease Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 And the Dols just recovered a Grossman sack/fumble at the Bears' 34.
Simon Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 One of the Bills best special teamers of the last few years is made inactive by a new staff all year for some reason, then they finally activate him and he takes a penalty to negate a nice play he made. Then the Bills actually pick up a bunch of field position after GB accepts the penalty! Are the football overlords throwing us a bone or setting us up?
darkman Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 825193[/snapback] At least were up 10.............................................. <- seems to be exactly what's happening this game.. something good happens... we take posession...we flounder... Devil, Doh, uhhh..
Simon Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Unfortunately, he's like Otto in "a Fish Called Wanda" re: 'the middle part'. 825184[/snapback] I heartily disagree. The guys is a legitimate blue-chip player whose greatest strenght happens to be his ability to close and finish.
UConn James Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 I heartily disagree. The guys is a legitimate blue-chip player whose greatest strenght happens to be his ability to close and finish. 825200[/snapback] Not disagreeing that Schoebel can finish a sack if the QB still can't find someone by the time AS recovers from getting matadored wide left. He is the king of the coverage sack.
Simon Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Not disagreeing that Schoebel can finish a sack if the QB still can't find someone by the time AS recovers from getting matadored wide left. He is the king of the coverage sack. 825204[/snapback] They're all coverage sacks...... And look there's another one for Schobel.
Dibs Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Not disagreeing that Schoebel can finish a sack if the QB still can't find someone by the time AS recovers from getting matadored wide left. He is the king of the coverage sack.825204[/snapback] You called it.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Do coverage sacks go under a different column?
dave mcbride Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 anyone who thinks schoebel is an average pass rusher must not watch much football. he's consistent, doesn't get hurt, doesn't take plays off, and puts up good numbers every year.
Simon Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Do coverage sacks go under a different column? 825210[/snapback] the high-motor column?
UConn James Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Do coverage sacks go under a different column? 825210[/snapback] Just saying that if that's the main thing your DL is counting on to pressure a QB, you're in trouble once the games start counting. I'd be fine with Schoebel if we had a legit DE opposite him (and, well, I'm fine with him anyway, just accept that this is his game). But we have Schoebel-Lite on the other side of Schoebel.
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 NICE!!!!!! Favre blows the chance to score
darkman Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Yea!!!!!!! 825216[/snapback] 1-5-GB 10 (:14) (Shotgun) B.Favre Aborted. S.Wells FUMBLES at BUF 9, RECOVERED by BUF-A.Schobel at BUF 10.
Recommended Posts