true_blue_bill Posted November 7, 2006 Author Posted November 7, 2006 You do realize you're a communist don't you. 827436[/snapback] Ya, for wanting the government to fully fund cancer research I'm a communist. Not surprising, really. Right wing sheep like you always fall back on that silly argument. A useful idiot, you are
true_blue_bill Posted November 7, 2006 Author Posted November 7, 2006 Maybe he is BF? Naw BF was much smarter. 827457[/snapback] Hey look, its a Conservative cluster fok! Not surprising they don't have anything of substance to say. Like I said, useful idiots ya are
Chef Jim Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Ya, for wanting the government to fully fund cancer research I'm a communist. Not surprising, really. Right wing sheep like you always fall back on that silly argument. A useful idiot, you are 827461[/snapback] Wow, bug up your ass huh? Explain to me why it is the government's responsibility to fund cancer research. Do you want it done right?
Chef Jim Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Hey look, its a Conservative cluster fok! Not surprising they don't have anything of substance to say. Like I said, useful idiots ya are 827466[/snapback] We've said it. The government is the worste entity to fund anything. You have yet to provide a useful arguement as to why they should.
IBTG81 Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Wow, bug up your ass huh? Explain to me why it is the government's responsibility to fund cancer research. Do you want it done right? 827469[/snapback] Well Jim, he did have the idiot part correct.
true_blue_bill Posted November 7, 2006 Author Posted November 7, 2006 Wow, bug up your ass huh? Explain to me why it is the government's responsibility to fund cancer research. Do you want it done right? 827469[/snapback] Snicker....ya, the funds from private sources, while they be much less, are simply better because they are private funds!
Chef Jim Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Well Jim, he did have the idiot part correct. 827474[/snapback] Thanks Ed. I take that as a compliment
IBTG81 Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Thanks Ed. I take that as a compliment 827480[/snapback]
Chef Jim Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Snicker....ya, the funds from private sources, while they be much less, are simply better because they are private funds! 827477[/snapback] How do you know much less. I will tell you this, they will be much better managed.
IBTG81 Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Snicker....ya, the funds from private sources, while they be much less, are simply better because they are private funds! 827477[/snapback] Who let Tenny back in here?
Alaska Darin Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 I didn't give a dime, I think my government should pay for it. That's one reason I'm voting Democrat. I think they will fully fund cancer research. Define fully funding. BTW, when your boyfriend Bill Clinton was President, AIDS was funded at about 6 times the rate of cancer, despite the fact that about 20 times as many people suffer from cancer than from AIDS. Because that was the fear monger issue of that day - brought to you by the terminally moronic. That might save my life some time in the future, or yours, for that matter. I sincerely hope that they don't save your life. The gene pool needs some chlorine and cancer may be as good a ticket as any. Take it personally. Really. There is an old joke that a Conservative is a liberal who has gotten mubbed. I'm sure if you get cancer you will agree with my postion on cancer funding. If not, then you are simply a useful idiot of the right. 827317[/snapback] Mubbed? WTF is that? I will never, under any circumstances, believe the government should fund research. That is not their role, nor should it be. Cancer research would see alot more money from the private sector if the average American wasn't being taxed at nearly 50% of every dollar they make. We can debate that figure, but you won't be informed enough to actually add anything to the conversation. It's people like you that absolutely guarantee that this country will be bankrupt in the not too distant future, for you have no understanding of the sheer amount of waste, graft, and corruption and instead actually believe the thieves who spend their days figuring out how to exploit your stupidity for their gain. Good job, lemming. The two party system owes its entire existance to the ignorance of you and those like you.
true_blue_bill Posted November 7, 2006 Author Posted November 7, 2006 We've said it. The government is the worste entity to fund anything. You have yet to provide a useful arguement as to why they should. 827473[/snapback] Sorry, its obvious you follow the Rush Limbo line that the government can't do anything right, except fight wars. Chuckle. That is all I'll say because you hold such a childish notion of how the world works. Most Americans correctly believe that the government should fund this. It's morally the right thing to do. If that makes too much sense to you I will understand.
true_blue_bill Posted November 7, 2006 Author Posted November 7, 2006 I will never, under any circumstances, believe the government should fund research. That is not their role, nor should it be. Cancer research would see alot more 827486[/snapback] That simply proves you are a stupid idiot. That's all.
Taro T Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 That simply proves you are a stupid idiot. That's all. 827497[/snapback] As opposed to a smart idiot like yourself. Right?
Chef Jim Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Sorry, its obvious you follow the Rush Limbo line that the government can't do anything right, except fight wars. Chuckle. That is all I'll say because you hold such a childish notion of how the world works. Most Americans correctly believe that the government should fund this. It's morally the right thing to do. If that makes too much sense to you I will understand. 827488[/snapback] I follow Rush. The government has shown time and time again that it can't handle money resposibly...including wars you nimrod. Most Americans agree with you? Can you provide any support of that? Having the government fund cancer research is the moral thing to do? If you feel so strongly about the government taking care of you from cradle to grave, why are you funding your own retirement?
true_blue_bill Posted November 7, 2006 Author Posted November 7, 2006 As opposed to a smart idiot like yourself. Right? 827506[/snapback] Smarter than that idiot, that's for damn sure!
Bungee Jumper Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Sorry, its obvious you follow the Rush Limbo line that the government can't do anything right, except fight wars. Chuckle. That is all I'll say because you hold such a childish notion of how the world works. Most Americans correctly believe that the government should fund this. It's morally the right thing to do. If that makes too much sense to you I will understand. 827488[/snapback] I'm still not clear on why it's the government's responsibility to look out for your health... I don't suppose you can tell us specifically what, out of NCI's $5B budget, was actually cut, can you? "Cancer research" is pretty vague - ignorantly vague, as a matter of fact.
IBTG81 Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 That simply proves you are a stupid idiot. That's all. 827497[/snapback] Well, I do agree with you in saying Darin is an idiot.
Alaska Darin Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 That simply proves you are a stupid idiot. That's all. 827497[/snapback] I'm not sure you could have paid me a better complement. Seriously, there's nothing better than being called an idiot by someone like you.
Bungee Jumper Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 Well, I do agree with you in saying Darin is an idiot. 827518[/snapback] Even since he spurned your advances, you two just can't get along...
Recommended Posts