Ball'n Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 That was very simular to how we lost to the Jags on the last play of the game in 2004. The Jaguar caught the ball out of bounds and then got shoved even further out and they called it a touchdown because of the push. Now the Jets guy was clearly landing in bounds and he was pushed out, yet it was ruled incomplete. Why did the Jag's get the call in 2004, yet not the Jets in this game? If the call today was the right one, the Bills would of been 10-6 and a playoff team in 2004...
BuffOrange Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 It wasn't similar at all; the Browns had the lead the whole game and the Jax guy in 04 got his feet down anyway.
zow2 Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 Jets got hosed. From the sideline angle It looked like their guy could not have come down in bounds but on the end zone angle he clearly would have gotten his feet down for a TD. Total screw job for J E T S.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 I agree, but I don't care. Add another team to the "hosed by the zebras" list.
gmac17 Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 Now the Jets guy was clearly landing in bounds and he was pushed out, yet it was ruled incomplete What I couldn't fathom is how the announcer could say that "I'm not sure if he would have come down in bounds". It was so obviously clear when watching the replay that he would have been in bounds that I have to think the NFL really puts the pressure on the announcers not to question the calls too much.
Heitz Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 What I couldn't fathom is how the announcer could say that "I'm not sure if he would have come down in bounds". It was so obviously clear when watching the replay that he would have been in bounds that I have to think the NFL really puts the pressure on the announcers not to question the calls too much. 819939[/snapback] gmac - that jumped out to me as well. Then they were all wishy-washy talking about reviewing the play. The refs should look at that, oh wait I guess the refs don't have to look at that, but maybe they should look at that. Of course they should! I *still* don't get why they wouldn't review that play! It's THE most critical play of the game!! If I were a Jets fan, I'd be pissed about that one...
BuffOrange Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 gmac - that jumped out to me as well. Then they were all wishy-washy talking about reviewing the play. The refs should look at that, oh wait I guess the refs don't have to look at that, but maybe they should look at that. Of course they should! I *still* don't get why they wouldn't review that play! It's THE most critical play of the game!! If I were a Jets fan, I'd be pissed about that one... 819959[/snapback] I think it was the wrong call. I also think that the announcer was in idiot - clearly his "momentum" would've carried him towards the back of the endzone and not towards the sideline. But there are announcers who rip officials. Also, the force-out is a judegement call and not reviewable.
YOOOOOO Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 gmac - that jumped out to me as well. Then they were all wishy-washy talking about reviewing the play. The refs should look at that, oh wait I guess the refs don't have to look at that, but maybe they should look at that. Of course they should! I *still* don't get why they wouldn't review that play! It's THE most critical play of the game!! If I were a Jets fan, I'd be pissed about that one... 819959[/snapback] Cuz it was a judgement call...and they cant be reveiwed...
Lori Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 Cuz it was a judgement call...and they cant be reveiwed... 819978[/snapback] Correct. In fact, we discussed this after the Jax game... Stadium Wall: September 2004
Recommended Posts