IBTG81 Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Meazza's into beastiality also. 817245[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 But she was 98 in dog years... 817243[/snapback] You're the only one who got my post. We, should all be pedophiles. If it hadn't been for Islam, there wouldn't be Pedophiles like meazza. That's what America deserves, pedophiles. meazza, should be President. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 You're the only one who got my post. We, should all be pedophiles. If it hadn't been for Islam, there wouldn't be Pedophiles like meazza. That's what America deserves, pedophiles. meazza, should be President. 817279[/snapback] Have another drink, boom... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 You're the only one who got my post. We, should all be pedophiles. If it hadn't been for Islam, there wouldn't be Pedophiles like meazza. That's what America deserves, pedophiles. meazza, should be President. 817279[/snapback] You seem to think people care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBTG81 Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Have another drink, boom... 817283[/snapback] Whatever happened to boom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Whatever happened to boom? 817288[/snapback] I'm boom. Right, eryn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 meazza, should be President.817279[/snapback] unfortunately meazza can't be president. unless the republicans change the constitution for the Governator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 unfortunately meazza can't be president.unless the republicans change the constitution for the Governator 817311[/snapback] Should I begin making fake promises and banning gay marriage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungee Jumper Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 banning gay marriage? 817316[/snapback] I know you don't like Ed, but that's just cruel... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 I know you don't like Ed, but that's just cruel... 817321[/snapback] Serves him right for the joke about the Polish dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 I'm boom. Right, eryn? 817292[/snapback] As far as I know, Yes. I like that I can blow up threads, without me even posting. Kinda cool. Boom, says Hi, BTW. He's hunting dogs that dig holes in back yards..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Whatever happened to boom? 817288[/snapback] He wised up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBTG81 Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Serves him right for the joke about the Polish dude. 817329[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 unfortunately meazza can't be president.unless the republicans change the constitution for the Governator 817311[/snapback] He's a canuck. He's still trying to fit in. Lost cause, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted October 26, 2006 Author Share Posted October 26, 2006 And here I was working it out from first principles, which is what was taking so long, and why I posted the flippant comment I did (to mark time, so you knew I'd seen the thread). But if you're going to be a dick about it: you're an idiot. Now I'm not answering. 817241[/snapback] Chicken! On a more serious note, I guess my earlier post came out the wrong way. I probably shouldn't have said anything beyond the fact that I'll take my hat off to whichever people get the question right. So post an answer or not, as you please. But I'd at least encourage you to work the problem out for yourself. Once you clearly see which answer is the right one, and why, it's a really good feeling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tux of Borg Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 It's estimated that 13.2 million people visited Myrtle Beach in 2004. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 It's estimated that 13.2 million people visited Myrtle Beach in 2004. 817428[/snapback] Assuming Rudolph was in front, there are 40,320 ways to rearrange the other eight reindeer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 It's estimated that 13.2 million people visited Myrtle Beach in 2004. 817428[/snapback] Did they come because of the snacks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 During the eugenics debate, a few of my adversaries made the erroneous claim that I don't understand statistics. I'm a little curious as to how well these people actually understand the subject themselves, so I'll pose a little test. I've already seen a statistics-oriented professor get this one wrong, so I won't automatically assume that anyone who does this for a living will get the right answer. Here goes. A survey is given out to people. Its intention is to determine which factors influence a person's decision to join the chess club. One of the questions is, "upon entering college, did you seriously consider joining the chess club? Yes or No." Based on the responses to that question, people were divided into the Interested and Uninterested groups. Both groups of people were also asked a series of questions of the following type: "On a scale from 1 - 5, how much would free snacks have influenced your decision to join the chess club?" The chess club wants to know the extent to which free snacks will influence someone's decision to join. There are two methodologies for determining this, but only one is correct. Method 1: Separate the survey respondents into Interested and Uninterested. See if there's a statistically significant difference between the two groups' preference for snacks. If there is, and if Interested people are significantly more likely to prefer snacks than Untinterested people, it's a signal that a preference for snacks is causing people to join the chess club. Ergo, the chess club should offer free snacks. Method 2: Separate the survey respondents into Interested and Uninterested. Ignore those who are Uninterested. Whichever things the Interested group said would make the biggest difference; these the chess club should do. 817135[/snapback] (Now I know what they're teaching at Keane this semester.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Coli Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 Neither. You look at the Uninterested group’s response to the snack question, and throw out the Interested responses. The Interested responses are biased, as they would have joined regardless of the snacks, as evidenced by their interest without the bribe (based on the wording of the question no snacks were offered). You want to see whether the presence of snacks would have had any influence on the Uninterested respondents. Your null hypothesis is that there is no influence, and any significant change from that would give you your answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts