The Poojer Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 say the Cheifs OL of a couple years ago...I know it is easier said than done, but we have not had a quality OL in years....Could a Peyton Manning have ANY success behind what we have been putting out there? I'm just sayin..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Yes, give JP an adequate OL and he will be fine. Just give JP a decent OC and this team will be much better. The playcalling just plain sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 say the Cheifs OL of a couple years ago...I know it is easier said than done, but we have not had a quality OL in years....Could a Peyton Manning have ANY success behind what we have been putting out there? I'm just sayin..... 813473[/snapback] Well I think part of the reason that Indi's 0-line looks so good is because Manning can make fast reads and get rid of the ball quickly. Not all the time. But much of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 say the Cheifs OL of a couple years ago...I know it is easier said than done, but we have not had a quality OL in years....Could a Peyton Manning have ANY success behind what we have been putting out there? I'm just sayin..... 813473[/snapback] Hard to say.....I'd want to see him play behind one for a season before I commit myself. Yes, P. Manning could have some success behind our line.....but to compare a young JPL to a veteran P.Manning is not really a fair comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Well I think part of the reason that Indi's 0-line looks so good is because Manning can make fast reads and get rid of the ball quickly. Not all the time. But much of the time. 813480[/snapback] It's also the playcalling. Why call for deep drops when the OL is bad. Run the damn ball, rollouts and short passes are whats needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 as good as peyton appears to be, a ton of the credit has to go to edge and marvin and...and...and...peyton is probably an anamoly...i dont want to take anything away from him, but the colts had tool upon tool upon tool...so perhaps my using peyton manning was not the best example...I mean, I was just sayin.... Well I think part of the reason that Indi's 0-line looks so good is because Manning can make fast reads and get rid of the ball quickly. Not all the time. But much of the time. 813480[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Tommy Brady has a ton more time back there than any of our QB's this century! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 No, because we have an adequate OL and JP sucks behind it. 813478[/snapback] WHAT! What 0-line? We dont have an adequate 0-line. No, no, no ... this is the BILLS message board. Here is your teams message board . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Indys guards are worse than ours, but they have real good tackles and a pretty good center. I could live with JP behind KC's line of a couple years ago though, most definitley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills Fan888 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Peyton Manning didnt do good in the playoff game agianst the Steelers because they were getting lots of pressure on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 i hear too many people say "...lets get Brady Quinn...", "...we shoulda gone with Leinert..." etc....put a dress on a pig and what do you get? A pig...wearing a dress...lets stop with the band-aids and lets fix the main problem once and for all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 as good as peyton appears to be, a ton of the credit has to go to edge and marvin and...and...and...peyton is probably an anamoly...i dont want to take anything away from him, but the colts had tool upon tool upon tool...so perhaps my using peyton manning was not the best example...I mean, I was just sayin.... 813487[/snapback] Edge is no longer with the Colts and Peyton has 1600 yards, 12 TD's, and 2 INT's ... Now go check out Harrisons numbers BEFORE and AFTER Peyton arrived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 yeah i know edge is no longer there and you can tell...addai is not edge and the 4 headed monster is not quite as potent as it was...although they do seem to make up for it in other places...wayne, freney...etc Edge is no longer with the Colts and Peyton has 1600 yards, 12 TD's, and 2 INT's ... Now go check out Harrisons numbers BEFORE and AFTER Peyton arrived. 813500[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 yeah i know edge is no longer there and you can tell...addai is not edge and the 4 headed monster is not quite as potent as it was...although they do seem to make up for it in other places...wayne, freney...etc 813507[/snapback] And yet they have just as many rushing yards this year as they had last year (up to this point) ... go figure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 i did not know that, they can't possibly have as many total yards without edge's catches can they????? And yet they have just as many rushing yards this year as they had last year (up to this point) ... go figure 813512[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 i hear too many people say "...lets get Brady Quinn...", "...we shoulda gone with Leinert..." etc....put a dress on a pig and what do you get? A pig...wearing a dress...lets stop with the band-aids and lets fix the main problem once and for all Look at the Jests.... drafted the top LT & Center & they are looking good as starters & getting better.... quick fix. Us? We'd do better with turnstiles. Where is Carl Mauch anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 The interior Indy line will cave in when the playoffs come as always though. Count on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 i did not know that, they can't possibly have as many total yards without edge's catches can they????? 813517[/snapback] Agh! I didnt think of catches. Oh well. But yeah, the rushing yards are within about 15 yards of each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 The interior Indy line will cave in when the playoffs come as always though. Count on it. 813523[/snapback] Yep . And Peyton will take the fall by the media even though he had about .02 seconds to throw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Too bad. I like Peyton but that is what happens when you try to get by with Mike Pucillo types at both guard spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts