nodnarb Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 the sense to ask Denny Green: "So, Denny, were the Raiders who you thought they were?" Oh, and it looks like the Reactionary Leinart Pendulum hath swung the other way. Figures, I picked Az in my king of the hill league.
Max997 Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 its no surprise Arizona came out flat today after blowing that game the way they did last week, not to mention they fired their offensive co-ordinator mid-week correct me if im wrong but Arizona only had one more win then the Raiders do so its not like this is some major upset, yes the Raiders stink but lets not confuse Arizona with Indy either
apuszczalowski Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 its no surprise Arizona came out flat today after blowing that game the way they did last week, not to mention they fired their offensive co-ordinator mid-week correct me if im wrong but Arizona only had one more win then the Raiders do so its not like this is some major upset, yes the Raiders stink but lets not confuse Arizona with Indy either 813131[/snapback] But Arizona has Leinart and almost beat the Bears, they are now an upper tier team in this league
Ramius Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 But Arizona has Leinart and almost beat the Bears, they are now an upper tier team in this league 813146[/snapback] How could arizona lose ot the raiders when they have "IT"
Dan Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 How could arizona lose ot the raiders when they have "IT" 813156[/snapback] MAybe they sold their IT on EBay
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 Looks like the only place Leinart has "it" is in his name.
ajzepp Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 How could arizona lose ot the raiders when they have "IT" 813156[/snapback]
Dawgg Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 Well who knows... I mean.... JP is a better passer than Mike Vick will ever be, right? How could arizona lose ot the raiders when they have "IT" 813156[/snapback]
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 Well who knows... I mean.... JP is a better passer than Mike Vick will ever be, right? Passer? Yes. RB? No.
Dawgg Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 Nice one... keep drinking that koolaid. This is what makes this board so entertaining. Passer? Yes. RB? No. 813166[/snapback]
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 Nice one... keep drinking that koolaid. This is what makes this board so entertaining. There's a difference between being a better passer, a better runner, and a threat. Vick is the latter 2 because of his speed. As a passer, he leaves a lot to be desired. At least JP doesn't blame his OC or WR's for his problems.
Ramius Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 Well who knows... I mean.... JP is a better passer than Mike Vick will ever be, right? 813165[/snapback] yes. Mike vick is the more dangerous threat. Looking at pure passing, mike vick is complete sh--, and JP is a much better passer.
soco Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 the sense to ask Denny Green: "So, Denny, were the Raiders who you thought they were?" I hope someone provokes him, I could use the entertainment.
Recommended Posts