meazza Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 You, sir, are a man of contradictions. On the one hand, your posts here suggest that you would feel neutral or positive about stupid people getting blown up. But elsewhere, when I suggested the more moderate and humane idea of merely using economic incentives to discourage stupid people from having children, you responded with a fair amount of hostility. Go figure. 816135[/snapback] omg
Chilly Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 You, sir, are a man of contradictions. On the one hand, your posts here suggest that you would feel neutral or positive about stupid people getting blown up. But elsewhere, when I suggested the more moderate and humane idea of merely using economic incentives to discourage stupid people from having children, you responded with a fair amount of hostility. Go figure. 816135[/snapback]
Bungee Jumper Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 You, sir, are a man of contradictions. On the one hand, your posts here suggest that you would feel neutral or positive about stupid people getting blown up. But elsewhere, when I suggested the more moderate and humane idea of merely using economic incentives to discourage stupid people from having children, you responded with a fair amount of hostility. Go figure. 816135[/snapback] Because your idea's a fantasy, you dolt. There's a difference between having contempt for idiots and believing incorrectly that you can breed them out of the gene pool. Christ, you're a moron.
Orton's Arm Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Because your idea's a fantasy, you dolt. I'm a little disturbed by the fact that you consider my idea of childbearing incentives to be more of a fantasy than your idea of simply blowing up stupid people. There's a difference between having contempt for idiots and believing incorrectly that you can breed them out of the gene pool. If you have such contempt for stupid people, why don't you want them bred out of the gene pool?
Bungee Jumper Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 I'm a little disturbed by the fact that you consider my idea of childbearing incentives to be more of a fantasy than your idea of simply blowing up stupid people. Because blowing them up is actually possible, you nit. If you have such contempt for stupid people, why don't you want them bred out of the gene pool? 816185[/snapback] Because it's not possible.
Chef Jim Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 It may need to be done. Now Jim, I wasn't alive during WWII like yourself, so I've never actually experienced a world war. What was it like? 816027[/snapback] Brilliant! And you wonder why we bag on you Headward.
IBTG81 Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Brilliant! And you wonder why we bag on you Headward. 816300[/snapback] Your shift at McDonald's over? Jimmy, how many times must I state that I don't give a !@#$ what you or the rest of the "Circle-Jerk" have to say? You can insult me, call me gay, I don't care. You guys are old, washed up men who have nothing better to do than sit around and try to look cool on a Buffalo Bills message board.
Chef Jim Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Your shift at McDonald's over? Jimmy, how many times must I state that I don't give a !@#$ what you or the rest of the "Circle-Jerk" have to say? You can insult me, call me gay, I don't care. You guys are old, washed up men who have nothing better to do than sit around and try to look cool on a Buffalo Bills message board. 816306[/snapback] Washed up? You don't even know what I do for a living do you?
Chilly Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Washed up? You don't even know what I do for a living do you? 816308[/snapback] You work in IT right?
Chef Jim Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 You work in IT right? 816309[/snapback] Oh it's IT alright.
Chilly Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Oh it's IT alright. 816310[/snapback] Just because you like workin it doesn't mean you work IN it!
IBTG81 Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Washed up? You don't even know what I do for a living do you? 816308[/snapback] Fry cook at McDonald's? Greeter at Walmart?
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 You guys are old, washed up men who have nothing better to do than sit around and try to look cool on a Buffalo Bills message board. 816306[/snapback] Is this somehow worse than a young, insecure dude who has nothing better to do than sit around and make an ass of himself on a Buffalo Bills message board?
Orton's Arm Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Because [breeding out stupid people is] not possible. Suppose you became convinced that it was possible to drastically reduce or eliminate the genetic propensity for stupidity. Would you feel doing so would be desirable?
Bungee Jumper Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Suppose you became convinced that it was possible to drastically reduce or eliminate the genetic propensity for stupidity. Would you feel doing so would be desirable? 816596[/snapback] First you'd have to demonstrate a genetic propensity for stupidity. And while I'm convinced that you, specifically, have one, I have yet to see any evidence of it in the population as a whole.
Orton's Arm Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 First you'd have to demonstrate a genetic propensity for stupidity. And while I'm convinced that you, specifically, have one, I have yet to see any evidence of it in the population as a whole. 816608[/snapback] I see you've lived in DC long enough to learn how to dodge questions! If you believed that stupid parents were disproportionately likely to have stupid children, would you favor trying to cut back on the number of children stupid people have?
Bungee Jumper Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 I see you've lived in DC long enough to learn how to dodge questions! If you believed that stupid parents were disproportionately likely to have stupid children, would you favor trying to cut back on the number of children stupid people have? 816616[/snapback] No. The world needs people to pump gas.
Ramius Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 So, if i am reading this correctly, according to Ed, we need to kill all muslims. But also according to Ed, guns are bad and need to be taken away. Are we going to go throw rocks at them? And just when Ed wasnt being retarded enough, holcombs arm jumps in and brings in his own top-of-the-line brand stupidity.
Chef Jim Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 Fry cook at McDonald's? Greeter at Walmart? 816357[/snapback] See Ed you wonder why people give you such a hard time. I tried to have a serious conversation with you and this is what I get. Now stop bothering me, the drive thru is backing up.
Orton's Arm Posted October 25, 2006 Posted October 25, 2006 No. The world needs people to pump gas. 816654[/snapback] Well, um, actually, the world doesn't need people to pump gas, because now it's self-serve and pay at the pump. Automation generally reduces the need for stupid people, while increasing the need for smart people. But perhaps you envisioned stupid people pumping gas so that if the gas station got blown up, they'd be taken with it.
Recommended Posts