tron35 Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 I know the defense did ok, but sure could of use spikes in there! I am so tired of hearing it a game time call. If spike can not play next week maybe it time to cut loses and use the money for another Quarterback.
dib Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 I'm tired of the cushions the secondary gives, and oh btw, Nate, pick up your jock it's laying on the field after you were faked out of it.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 I know the defense did ok, but sure could of use spikes in there! I am so tired of hearing it a game time call. If spike can not play next week maybe it time to cut loses and use the money for another Quarterback. 799566[/snapback] Illiteracy, it's a B word.
dib Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 Illiteracy, it's a B word. 799582[/snapback] Yesterday, I could not spell: "student". Today, I are one.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 I know the defense did ok, but sure could of use spikes in there! I am so tired of hearing it a game time call. If spike can not play next week maybe it time to cut loses and use the money for another Quarterback. The defense did OK?
marauderswr80 Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 spend money on a new QB? I bet you all over JP jock the past 2 weeks huh...... I do agree about the Spikes situation, practices all week and just before the game cant play...makes no sense to me
5 Wide Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 Hammy's are tough to come from, if we cut Spikes we're still on the hook for the cap hit, although when you're ALREADY over 10 Million under the cap I dunno why you'd cut one of the only leaders you have in the locker room.
keepthefaith Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 I know the defense did ok, but sure could of use spikes in there! I am so tired of hearing it a game time call. If spike can not play next week maybe it time to cut loses and use the money for another Quarterback. 799566[/snapback] If for some reason Spikes can no longer play, the Bills will be shopping for a linebacker next year.
bluv Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 If for some reason Spikes can no longer play, the Bills will be shopping for a linebacker next year. 799622[/snapback] I wish we had kept Posey just for insurance if nothing else
bdelma Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 The Bills are in need of a speed rusher to take the place of #92, 90.
tennesseeboy Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 spikes has been hurt a lot and I'm as frustrated as most fans. However, I suspect he is at least as frustrated as we are. Hope he comes back soon and proves he's as good as he's touted to be here. Right now I've gotta put him as the most over-rated player...not because he isn't good..but because he just isn't playing.
shagmago Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 The Bills are in need of a speed rusher to take the place of #92, 90. 799727[/snapback] What?.....our high motor white guys, their the best!..................NOT!
Marv's Neighbor Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 Spikes is upset about Vincent? He should join him!
Swift Sylvan Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 Hey while we're at it how about a FB or a TE or a .......
keepthefaith Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 They drafted McCargo for that. 799767[/snapback] No, McCargo is a "3". In this defense the bigger stronger guy is where Williams and Anderson are playing. The Bills do need a wrecker in there. Jury still out on Williams, but Anderson is likely to be replaced IMO. The Bears have 8 D-Lineman that can really play. 8 starters or near-starting quality guys that they have accumulated over the past 4 years or so.
frogger Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 no, really a NT is what we need, above everything, someone that isn't moved out of the way as easy as Anderson is. What I wouldn't give for Pat Williams, he would have been Ideal
keepthefaith Posted October 9, 2006 Posted October 9, 2006 no, really a NT is what we need, above everything, someone that isn't moved out of the way as easy as Anderson is. What I wouldn't give for Pat Williams, he would have been Ideal 800129[/snapback] He would. He also had the quickness to play this new defense I believe.
Recommended Posts