BoondckCL Posted October 5, 2006 Posted October 5, 2006 I don't know why you guys are talking about Losman, it is obvious that he is not the answer. Play Losman for 8 games, and play Holcomb for 8 games, whoever does better is our starting quarterback next year.
Rubes Posted October 5, 2006 Author Posted October 5, 2006 Yeah. Like we need another thread hijacked by this.
BoondckCL Posted October 5, 2006 Posted October 5, 2006 Yeah. Like we need another thread hijacked by this. 795729[/snapback] Sorry. I just got home, i didn't realize you guys have been fighting the good fight all day against douches like BillsMan06. Losman is the man though, for real.
Bob in STL Posted October 5, 2006 Posted October 5, 2006 Great post Rubes. What's all the quibbling with the B-/C+ thing? I was always under the impression that they were basically the same thing. IMO....assuming your B- or C+ is correct....you picked the right one with B-. The offence has been improving, therefore B- fits. If the offence was regressing, C+ would suit better.....i.e. using the difference between a B- & a C+ as a trend indicator rather than an ability difference. 795699[/snapback] My father would have disagreed. B- looked better on the card, every time.
Recommended Posts