inkman Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 Does anyone think Clements should be back there? 795029[/snapback] no
I Forgot My Last Username Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 inkman, you are a credit to this board. Thank you for that well reasoned reply.
inkman Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 inkman, you are a credit to this board. 795103[/snapback] I get the feeling your sarcasm meter was on high.
inkman Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 inkman, you are a credit to this board. Thank you for that well reasoned reply. 795103[/snapback] Well, if you remember correctly, Nate had more problems handling the rock than little Roscoe. Dude put it on the carpet all the !@#$ing time. I hate to say it, but I feel losing Nate would really hurt the D. Losing Roscoe, not a big deal. Parrish led the league in return avg last year and I think has a good chance to do it a well this year. I also think he will break one or two before the season is over.
I Forgot My Last Username Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 ink I agree with you that if Roscoe Parrish gets hurt, the defense would not suffer. But I think you need to get your best players on the field and not be scared of them getting hurt those extra five-ten plays a game. Also, if you look at the stats, Clements fumbles one of every 10 returns, Roscoe one of every 4.
Recommended Posts