inkman Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 Does anyone think Clements should be back there? 795029[/snapback] no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Forgot My Last Username Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 inkman, you are a credit to this board. Thank you for that well reasoned reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 inkman, you are a credit to this board. 795103[/snapback] I get the feeling your sarcasm meter was on high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 inkman, you are a credit to this board. Thank you for that well reasoned reply. 795103[/snapback] Well, if you remember correctly, Nate had more problems handling the rock than little Roscoe. Dude put it on the carpet all the !@#$ing time. I hate to say it, but I feel losing Nate would really hurt the D. Losing Roscoe, not a big deal. Parrish led the league in return avg last year and I think has a good chance to do it a well this year. I also think he will break one or two before the season is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Forgot My Last Username Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 ink I agree with you that if Roscoe Parrish gets hurt, the defense would not suffer. But I think you need to get your best players on the field and not be scared of them getting hurt those extra five-ten plays a game. Also, if you look at the stats, Clements fumbles one of every 10 returns, Roscoe one of every 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts