Buffalo Baumer Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 So much for the boost on Defense because he won't be there on Sunday. Too bad because if buffalo does not beat the Vikings, the season (playoff chances)) could be over after the Bears game.
Kelly the Dog Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 So much for the boost on Defense because he won't be there on Sunday. Too bad because if buffalo does not beat the Vikings, the season (playoff chances)) could be over after the Bears game. 789996[/snapback] Where does this come from? I am not denying it or saying you are wrong, but according to the News and Chris Brown he did practice Wednesday and Thursday, the two most important days. Friday is more of a walk-through. Linebacker Takeo Spikes (hamstring) and safety Matt Bowen (leg) are still questionable, but they moved another step closer to being ready for Sunday's game against the Vikings by participating in individual and team work for the second straight practice. They will be game-time decisions, Jauron said.
Buffalo Baumer Posted September 29, 2006 Author Posted September 29, 2006 I just heard on WGR 550 that he did not practice today so I was assuming that was not good news. I know he practiced the two previous days so I wonder if there was a setback.....
Kelly the Dog Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 I just heard on WGR 550 that he did not practice today so I was assuming that was not good news. I know he practiced the two previous days so I wonder if there was a setback..... 790034[/snapback] I think they want to rest him on Friday because it's not important. It does say, however, that he is not completely back. It doesn't say he won't play. Update: This KFFL blurb doesn't list a source but now it says he likely won't play. Who knows. It looks like he won't though. We need him. Bills | Spikes unlikely to play Week 4Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:12:49 -0700 Buffalo Bills LB Takeo Spikes (hamstring) did not practice Friday, Sept. 29, and appears unlikely to play Week 4. Spikes remains listed as questionable.
dave mcbride Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 I think they want to rest him on Friday because it's not important. It does say, however, that he is not completely back. It doesn't say he won't play. Update: This KFFL blurb doesn't list a source but now it says he likely won't play. Who knows. It looks like he won't though. We need him. 790046[/snapback] those hamstrings seem to always turn out to be 4 week injuries ...
RuntheDamnBall Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 This is really, really crappy. This defense needs TKO. It is average without him, and incredible with him.
crackur Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 its getting ridiculous now that he isnt playing.......sheesh
Kelly the Dog Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 its getting ridiculous now that he isnt playing.......sheesh 790159[/snapback] What are you implying or thinking is ridiculous about it? It's a hamstring injury. Since the dawn of man no one has been able to easily predict how long it will take any person anywhere to recover fully from. Each one is different. Are you thinking perhaps Takeo Spikes is a kitty for not playing hurt? Or that Spikes is not hurt but the coaches are keeping him out for no reason? What possible explanation could there be for this except that he is not ready to play because his hamstring is still too sore?
ACor58 Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 This defense needs TKO. It is average without him, and incredible with him. 790153[/snapback] A sack, a fumble, and a Touchdown is incredible, and all in one play.
ganesh Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 What are you implying or thinking is ridiculous about it? It's a hamstring injury. Since the dawn of man no one has been able to easily predict how long it will take any person anywhere to recover fully from. Each one is different. Are you thinking perhaps Takeo Spikes is a kitty for not playing hurt? Or that Spikes is not hurt but the coaches are keeping him out for no reason? What possible explanation could there be for this except that he is not ready to play because his hamstring is still too sore? 790162[/snapback] Hamstring injuries are bad and unpredictable....Steve Smith missed the entire training camp and came back in game 3. Hines Ward missed training camp and still is not fully recovered...
Buffalo Baumer Posted September 29, 2006 Author Posted September 29, 2006 What are you implying or thinking is ridiculous about it? It's a hamstring injury. Since the dawn of man no one has been able to easily predict how long it will take any person anywhere to recover fully from. Each one is different. Are you thinking perhaps Takeo Spikes is a kitty for not playing hurt? Or that Spikes is not hurt but the coaches are keeping him out for no reason? What possible explanation could there be for this except that he is not ready to play because his hamstring is still too sore? 790162[/snapback] I don't think people are accusing Spikes of faking anything or lacking heart - I bet that there is just frustration because he is someone who probably could have turned one if not both of those losses into Ws.
MDH Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 What are you implying or thinking is ridiculous about it? It's a hamstring injury. Since the dawn of man no one has been able to easily predict how long it will take any person anywhere to recover fully from. Each one is different. Are you thinking perhaps Takeo Spikes is a kitty for not playing hurt? Or that Spikes is not hurt but the coaches are keeping him out for no reason? What possible explanation could there be for this except that he is not ready to play because his hamstring is still too sore? 790162[/snapback] I'd just like to see him sit out of practice totally until its healed. Coming in every week and practicing only to aggravate it and not play is pointless and only prolongs the recovery time.
Kelly the Dog Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 I don't think people are accusing Spikes of faking anything or lacking heart - I bet that there is just frustration because he is someone who probably could have turned one if not both of those losses into Ws. 790200[/snapback] I understand that, surely. Just wondered why anyone would say this was "ridiculous".
millbank Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 Spikes on downside of 50/50 to play sunday says coach.
crackur Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 I'd just like to see him sit out of practice totally until its healed. Coming in every week and practicing only to aggravate it and not play is pointless and only prolongs the recovery time. 790211[/snapback] I couldnt agree more
generaLee83 Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 Sadly enough I think Spikes' career is over. He will be missed tremendously but it's time to start looking and planning past him.
34-78-83 Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 Sadly enough I think Spikes' career is over. He will be missed tremendously but it's time to start looking and planning past him. 790327[/snapback] I know it's an opinion , but that sounds ridiculous to me. So you're saying that the hammy injury is somehow a continuation last year's injury, from which he worked so hard and recovered from?
RunTheBall Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 The thing with hamstring injuries is that if you remain immobile (and don't practice) the hamstring tightens up and could be more severely injured on the resumption of strenuous activities. It's a fine line TKO is walking between practicing, keeping that hammy warmed up and overexertion. I think this is going to be a season long concern and is likely related to his achilles injury (favoring one leg, or one leg being stronger than the other). RTB
Bill from NYC Posted September 29, 2006 Posted September 29, 2006 I know it's an opinion , but that sounds ridiculous to me. So you're saying that the hammy injury is somehow a continuation last year's injury, from which he worked so hard and recovered from? 790346[/snapback] I don't think that TKO is necessarily finished, but imo the Bills need to address the LB position in a big way in 07, even if we are able (fingers crossed) to re-sign Fletcher. We need some youth and depth there. All of you guys who belly-ache about not drafting early round blockers should take note of the above, OK?
Recommended Posts