stuckincincy Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Somebody try this and let us know... http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=1...-name_page.html Excerpts... "Meet the Quad Stacker. Four whopping beef burgers, separated by four slices of melted cheese, topped by eight rashers of glistening bacon, smothered in creamy sauce, sandwiched between two halves of buttered bun, all dripping with a coating of grease. Calories: 1,000 Equivalent of three Mars Bars Fat: 68g The equivalent to five tablespoons of butter Saturated fat: 30g The equivalent to 15 bags of chips Sodium: 1.8g The equivalent to two bags chips, three slices white bread, one large chunk of cheese, two digestive biscuits and one large sausage" "The BK Stacker is simple. It's built with the very ingredients our restaurant guests love best - meat, cheese and bacon," says Denny Marie Post, Burger King's senior vice president and chief concept officer. "We're satisfying serious meat lovers by leaving off salad and letting them decide exactly how much meat and cheese they can handle." But Mirror nutritionist Gillian McKeith warns people to steer clear of BK's latest creation, which carries the slogan: "Stack it high, tough guy." "Why would anybody eat this? If you want to be fat, sick, gassy, farting, bloated and ill, go right ahead," she says. "The lack of fibre means it will probably sit inside you for days, putrefying and fermenting, creating bloating and bad gas along with the constipation. Your poo will stink."
Puhonix Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Still smaller than Hardee's Monster Burger: Hardee's new burger boasts two 1/3-pound slabs of Angus beef, four strips of bacon, three slices of American cheese and some mayonnaise -- all on a buttered, toasted, sesame seed bun. 1,420-calorie 107 grams of fat
stuckincincy Posted September 22, 2006 Author Posted September 22, 2006 Still smaller than Hardee's Monster Burger: Hardee's new burger boasts two 1/3-pound slabs of Angus beef, four strips of bacon, three slices of American cheese and some mayonnaise -- all on a buttered, toasted, sesame seed bun. 1,420-calorie 107 grams of fat 782798[/snapback] Yes - the article states that. Have you had one?
Puhonix Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Yes - the article states that. Have you had one? 782801[/snapback] so it does.... And yes, I've had exactly one, and I think I'll leave it at that.
stuckincincy Posted September 22, 2006 Author Posted September 22, 2006 so it does.... And yes, I've had exactly one, and I think I'll leave it at that. 782822[/snapback] ...
The Avenger Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Beware of any burger that, when sold, comes with the counterperson asking, "would you like a defibrilator with that?"
taterhill Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 anyone have the nutrition guide for a garbage plate
stuckincincy Posted September 22, 2006 Author Posted September 22, 2006 anyone have the nutrition guide for a garbage plate 782887[/snapback] " Nick's Analysis* Total Wt (g) % Moisture Total fat (g) % Fat Burger 103.7 54.5 21.56 38.30 Mac 242.66 51.2 47.34 38.07 Taters 151.53 56.3 23.55 27.60 Bread 89.57 27.0 0.57 0.67 Total 587.03 --- 93.02 15.8 This was a take home plate and they are always larger than the plates at Nick's. The total fat is high but comparing it to a fast food burger, pound per pound, it is about the same. I do not want this to deter anybody from eating Nick's, there is nothing like it. " http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/sjs16/nicks.html
crackur Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 this is old........I've ate two........need some veggies on there tho.....maybe another piece of meat
buckeyemike Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 I believe I will stick to my Romanburger from Mr. Hero. And from the Cleveland Clinic web site re: nutritional value: Romanburger hot sub - 717 cals, 47g fat, 15g sat fat It's not as bad as the Stacker. But it's bad enough.
LewPort71 Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Mr. Hero ...Romanburger....I have not had one in 18 years,,,but can still remember exactly what they tasted like.... yup That Burger King burger looks like it should feed a family of four....
Gavin in Va Beach Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 This guy says the new Burger King Stacker is for pussies... http://xo.typepad.com/blog/images/burger.jpg
eball Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 But Mirror nutritionist Gillian McKeith warns people to steer clear of BK's latest creation, which carries the slogan: "Stack it high, tough guy." "Why would anybody eat this? If you want to be fat, sick, gassy, farting, bloated and ill, go right ahead," she says. "The lack of fibre means it will probably sit inside you for days, putrefying and fermenting, creating bloating and bad gas along with the constipation. Your poo will stink." She said "poo."
stuckincincy Posted September 22, 2006 Author Posted September 22, 2006 She said "poo." 783137[/snapback] I know. Those silly Brits...
/dev/null Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 I had the triple. Wasn't anything special
Just Jack Posted September 23, 2006 Posted September 23, 2006 this is old........I've ate two........need some veggies on there tho.....maybe another piece of meat 782969[/snapback] If you want veggies, get a whopper, the stacker is meant to be just meat.
Buffal0 Bill5 Posted September 23, 2006 Posted September 23, 2006 "Why would anybody eat this? If you want to be fat, sick, gassy, farting, bloated and ill, go right ahead," she says. A day in the life, I'm in!
Recommended Posts