generaLee83 Posted September 19, 2006 Share Posted September 19, 2006 It's nice to see him with 2 sacks in 2 games. Maybe he's coming into his own as a player or maybe this style of defense is appropriate for his approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamrock Posted September 19, 2006 Share Posted September 19, 2006 It's nice to see him with 2 sacks in 2 games. Maybe he's coming into his own as a player or maybe this style of defense is appropriate for his approach. 778957[/snapback] From what i can read, it seems the Ends responsibility is to get upfield without as much requirement to be an anchor at the line. Naturally, this suits a slighter end and to be honest is much more fun for the smaller guys without as much lead. Allows them to play at a more "normal" weight for their bodies/ strength. I'd say this defense is a better fit after 2 weeks...we'll see how the engine is running in December, maybe rotation will suit as well as the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt in KC Posted September 19, 2006 Share Posted September 19, 2006 It's nice to see him with 2 sacks in 2 games. Maybe he's coming into his own as a player or maybe this style of defense is appropriate for his approach. 778957[/snapback] The whole D-line seems to be doing pretty well so far. But, given Denney's performance on Sunday, Chris seems like an odd choice of a player to single out for praise. If Crowell didn't make the interception, it looks like it was going straight to Denney (further downfield than the LB?!). That would have made Sunday hands-down the best day statisically he'd ever have (3 sacks, FF, INT!). All this said, the scheme seems to be working. Without Kelsay pushing on so many downs, Denney may not have been so strong on his plays.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts