Acantha Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 Why didn't we score 80? 777874[/snapback] Fuggin Lindell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbills17 Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 Nate was on Booker most of the day and McGee was on Chambers, from my watching of the game. And yes, Booker had a couple of nice catches vs. Nate. 777854[/snapback] I saw this too, anyone know why Nate was not covering Chambers, anything to do with Chambers lighting NC up last year? You'd think the size factor alone would put Nate on Chambers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 Is this a joke? The Bills racked up a bunch of coverage sacks and thier corners were the primary reason. On a day when Culpepper threw about 30 balls Clements gave up a grand total of two completions. The first was a direct result of him being lined up in that loose dirt on that garbage field while Booker was able to make his cut off grass. The second was a 10yrd sideline completion on 2nd and 16. Not to mention there were multiple instances of him sticking his face in the blender in run support to make tackles on a RB while he was being blocked by a bigger WR. I saw this too, anyone know why Nate was not covering Chambers, anything to do with Chambers lighting NC up last year? You'd think the size factor alone would put Nate on Chambers? Nate plays corner on the left side for the Bills while McGee plays on the right side. This is a static situation in which the Bills have elected not to have Nate chase opposing WR's around the field. It was Miami who elected to have Chambers matched up against McGee for most of the day, likely because they wanted to throw at him but had no interest in putting the ball anywhere near Clements. Props to McGee for being up to the challenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tar and Feathers Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 I am here on standby. Just tell me where to meet you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 I am here on standby. Just tell me where to meet you guys. 778089[/snapback] Always easy to run the negative line. If things go poorly, it's the old I-you-so. If it goes well, your words get lost in a victory. Very, very old hat, pal...We and general society have seen such clowning and self-stroking for decade after decade after decade... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 Nate plays corner on the left side for the Bills while McGee plays on the right side. 778068[/snapback] No, McGee plays LCB and Nate plays RCB. Here You Go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 No, McGee plays LCB and Nate plays RCB. Here You Go 778345[/snapback] Doh, typing in too many thread at once. Yes, Nate always lines up on the right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 Doh, typing in too many thread at once. Yes, Nate always lines up on the right. 778349[/snapback] I'm sorry...now you have zero credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 I'm sorry...now you have zero credibility. 778358[/snapback] That would imply he had credibility before. I'm sorry, anyone as vociferous in their defense of the indefensible is seriously deficient in the credibility department. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts