KD in CA Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Wow...Reed didn't even need to touch him for the play to work.
darkman Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Is that a BS call or legit??? 776043[/snapback] Looks / Sounds legit to me..
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Wow...Reed didn't even need to touch him for the play to work. 776042[/snapback] He did need to block the guy...after the ball was caught. Not before.
YOOOOOO Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 its legit....... tough call for Reed though....that is exactly what he is suppose to do
Dibs Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Looks / Sounds legit to me.. 776044[/snapback] Fair enough.
Lori Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Close. Probably would've called him for holding if not PI, though. Incomplete. Lindell on for the FG. 16-0.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Is that a BS call or legit??? 776043[/snapback] Legit. Nit-picky, the Patriots would have got away with it, but it was a legit call.
darkman Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Fair enough. 776047[/snapback] Okay..16 to 0.. rather have seen 20 to 0 though..
Frez Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Lindell looks like a real NFL kicker this year. WTF is up?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 its legit.......tough call for Reed though....that is exactly what he is suppose to do 776046[/snapback] Almost exactly. He was about a half-second too early doing it.
MichFan Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right?
Lori Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Crap. Gotta go to work. Cheer 'em on to victory for me, guys!
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Okay..16 to 0.. rather have seen 20 to 0 though.. 776050[/snapback] Two TD's down though. NOW if Jauron wants to go for it on 4th and 1 in FG range, I'm for it.
Florida_BillsFan Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Ryan Lindell is the man! ESAD Mike Malarkey !!
YOOOOOO Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right? 776053[/snapback] nah it was forward by bout a year and half...... but we all know one crew didnt think a yard and half forward was a foirward pass(music city bull sh--)
darkman Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Okay.. They put a nail in.. but hit it wrong and bent the nail.. damn..
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right? 776053[/snapback] Could be. I'd have to rewind and check...I'll do it later.
KD in CA Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right? 776053[/snapback] No, not even close. Parish came back to the line of scrimmage before the catch, but it was still a forward pass by about 6 yards.
Recommended Posts