Albany,n.y. Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 With Bob Matthews-1st time in years Bills GM on WHAM, Butler used to do a weekly show years ago. Even came on & did the show the week he was fired. This week he's on Tuesday because on this Thursday he is busy. He will be on Thursdays in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted September 12, 2006 Author Share Posted September 12, 2006 A few minutes ago Matthews said he doesn't have Marv's number & he hopes that Marv calls in. If Marv is waiting for them to call him, there might not be a show tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 A few minutes ago Matthews said he doesn't have Marv's number & he hopes that Marv calls in. If Marv is waiting for them to call him, there might not be a show tonight. 771091[/snapback] He doesn't have Marv's number. Might it have been a good idea to GET Marv's number before announcing him as a guest? Does he have Scott Berchtold's number, I wonder? After all, the Bills DO have a PR department... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted September 12, 2006 Author Share Posted September 12, 2006 Marv made it on, started at 7:12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Marv made it on, started at 7:12 771110[/snapback] GO! Marv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 He doesn't have Marv's number. Might it have been a good idea to GET Marv's number before announcing him as a guest? Does he have Scott Berchtold's number, I wonder? After all, the Bills DO have a PR department... 771098[/snapback] Marv's too old to deal with numbers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike formerly from Florida Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 GO! Marv. 771111[/snapback] Let me know if Marv says anything about the overoficious jerks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I suspect Marv uses carbon-dating more than a watch these days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted September 12, 2006 Author Share Posted September 12, 2006 Matthews asked about the officiating. Marv said they review films & might let the league know of their complaint, but they are not supposed to talk about it publically. He also ended 1st segment saying he wants to protect his wallet. I guess they fine team officials who publically state the obvious about the poor officiating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Risin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Any word on if he thinks Aaron Brooks is better then Holcomb and Losman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted September 12, 2006 Author Share Posted September 12, 2006 Talking about the draft. Matthews asked him about not drafting Leinart. Marv stated that they were not drafting a QB because it would have been too much chaos creating a QB controversy without giving JP a chance to succeed. Then he said IF THE BILLS HAD DRAFTED A QB, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CUTLER, NOT LEINART. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Talking about the draft. Matthews asked him about not drafting Leinart. Marv stated that they were not drafting a QB because it would have been too much chaos creating a QB controversy without giving JP a chance to succeed. Then he said IF THE BILLS HAD DRAFTED A QB, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CUTLER, NOT LEINART. 771137[/snapback] I don't doubt that at all. ML would have been a disaster in the elements at Rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 Marv's too old to deal with numbers... 771113[/snapback] So is Matthews. Thanks for the recap, Harv... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Y. Orangeman Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 I don't doubt that at all. ML would have been a disaster in the elements at Rich. 771141[/snapback] I guess we'll never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted September 13, 2006 Author Share Posted September 13, 2006 I guess we'll never know. 771174[/snapback] Unless he comes into the Ralph & kicks our @ss, with a lot of deep balls in the wind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 I guess we'll never know. 771174[/snapback] Count me as one who hopes so. Remember Joe Montana in the AFC Championship game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Y. Orangeman Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 Count me as one who hopes so. Remember Joe Montana in the AFC Championship game? 771177[/snapback] Yeah, but I'm not sure it is relevant to the comparison. Here's hoping this argument ends this year.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted September 13, 2006 Author Share Posted September 13, 2006 Count me as one who hopes so. Remember Joe Montana in the AFC Championship game? 771177[/snapback] He was a little past his prime & didn't know where he was by the time our D was through with him. I remember chanting before the game Joe Cool? Joe Cold? JOE OLD!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 He was a little past his prime & didn't know where he was by the time our D was through with him. 771181[/snapback] And his passes were all over the place. It wouldn't have mattered if he was at his peak - he COULD NOT play in the elements. COULDN'T DO IT. The Giants beat them 49-3 in the playoffs at the Meadowlands for exactly the same reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Y. Orangeman Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 And his passes were all over the place. It wouldn't have mattered if he was at his peak - he COULD NOT play in the elements. COULDN'T DO IT. The Giants beat them 49-3 in the playoffs at the Meadowlands for exactly the same reason. 771183[/snapback] I'm not disputing the Montana peformance. What I am not convinced of is that Leinart is Montana reincarnate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts