nodnarb Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 The Patriots were flagged for just one 5-yard infraction, although there were at least four plays on which a Patriots offensive lineman wrapped both arms around a Buffalo pass-rusher, and the Flying Elvii benefited from an extremely convenient inadvertent whistle that ended a play when a Buffalo runner had 50 yards of green grass between him and the end zone. Meanwhile, the Bills were hit with seven penalties, including a ticky-tack nudge-in-the-back call that wiped out a fourth-quarter first down in New England territory and changed a scoring opportunity into a punt. As if winning an NFL game isn't hard enough... http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story...terbrook/060912 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I'm confused. Does this mean we like Easterbrook now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrite Gal Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I'm confused. Does this mean we like Easterbrook now? 771005[/snapback] Nah! He is still a legend in his own mind. We do agree with him on this though, but even a broken clock can be right twice a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Nah! He is still a legend in his own mind. Thanks. I definitely needed a ruling on that. We do agree with him on this though, but even a broken clock can be right twice a day. 771016[/snapback] The exception to this rule, obviously, is VABills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRW Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 The exception to this rule, obviously, is VABills. 771024[/snapback] He did say "can be", not "is". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 He did say "can be", not "is". 771029[/snapback] Excellent point. Since it was Barry Brady, I only skimmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I'm confused. Does this mean we like Easterbrook now? 771005[/snapback] I'm confused too, but only because this roughly the 8th thread about this on page 1. But why scroll down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 But why scroll down? 771046[/snapback] How do you do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 How do you do that? 771050[/snapback] well, first you gotta put down the HotPocket® Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 well, first you gotta put down the HotPocket® 771052[/snapback] Is that what the kids are calling them now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 well, first you gotta put down the HotPocket® 771052[/snapback] Look, i cant concentrate on listening to ESPN and eating my hot pocket while i am trying to figure out this whole "scrolling" thing. Please keep things simpler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 well, first you gotta put down the HotPocket® 771052[/snapback] wouldn't that be the Pocket Rocket? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I'm confused. Does this mean we like Easterbrook now? 771005[/snapback] He consistently bashes the new uniforms. That makes him OK in my book... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 He consistently bashes the new uniforms. That makes him OK in my book... 771102[/snapback] Excellent point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gallagher Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 It'll be interesting to hear what Pereira has to say on Official Review tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 He consistently bashes the new uniforms. That makes him OK in my book... 771102[/snapback] I like our uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I like our uniforms. 771107[/snapback] and the overwhelming suckcess that has come with them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodnarb Posted September 13, 2006 Author Share Posted September 13, 2006 I'm confused. Does this mean we like Easterbrook now? 771005[/snapback] Easterbrook rules. Tell ya what, he pegged Mularkey EARLY, when most of us, including me, were still defending him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 I'm confused. Does this mean we like Easterbrook now? 771005[/snapback] No, he said we made the wrong call on 4th and 1. So we don't like him, but we don't hate him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts